Jansen Chow

Jansen Chow is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in mental capacity law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 54.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jansen Chow has demonstrated expertise across 70 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Geomancy Service	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banker Customer Relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jansen Chow has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jansen Chow has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	9 cases	69% of cases	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Unauthorized Trading & Agency in Securities Market(Dec 2016) Lotusonwater Jadeite v Ang Chee Soon: Breach of Contract for Sandalwood Statue(May 2013) PT Prima v Kempinski: Illegality, Force Majeure & New Management Contract in Hotel Management Dispute(Jul 2012)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	31% of cases	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction(Oct 2023) Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v OUE Lippo: Revocation of Voluntary Arrangement for Lack of Candour and Material Irregularities(Aug 2020) Vuillemin v Overseas-Chinese Banking Corp: Recusal Application & Anton Piller Order Appeal(Apr 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jansen Chow's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	31%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	15%
Won	72.0 parties avg	2.0	54%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jansen Chow's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(31%)	31%
Partial	2(15%)	15%
Won	7(54%)	54%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,590,532.14	512,933.167 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction 03 Oct 2023 ILC Co, Ltd (Applicant)Lost	03 Oct 2023	ILC Co, Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedCommittal application against the 3rd and 4th respondents was dismissed. Costs in the sum of $4,000 each, plus reasonable disbursements, were awarded to the 3rd and 4th defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v OUE Lippo: Revocation of Voluntary Arrangement for Lack of Candour and Material Irregularities 16 Aug 2020 OUE Lippo Healthcare Limited (Respondent)Won	16 Aug 2020	OUE Lippo Healthcare Limited (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to revoke the proposed third voluntary arrangement.
3	Vuillemin v Overseas-Chinese Banking Corp: Recusal Application & Anton Piller Order Appeal 19 Apr 2018 Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2018	Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Recusal Summons DismissedThe application for the judge to recuse himself was dismissed.
4	AmFraser Securities v Goh Chengyu: Unauthorized Trading & Agency in Securities Market 26 Dec 2016 AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	26 Dec 2016	AMFRASER SECURITIES PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $1,888,954.60, plus interest. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
5	Werner Samuel Vuillemin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Appeal Extension & Security for Costs 29 Nov 2016 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2016	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant): Successful Resistance of ApplicationSuccessfully resisted the plaintiff's application for an extension of time to appeal against the Appeal Dismissal Order.
6	Lotusonwater Jadeite v Ang Chee Soon: Breach of Contract for Sandalwood Statue 06 May 2013 Lotusonwater Jadeite Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 May 2013	Lotusonwater Jadeite Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $476,610.16, plus interest and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	PT Prima v Kempinski: Illegality, Force Majeure & New Management Contract in Hotel Management Dispute 08 Jul 2012 Kempinski Hotels SA (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	08 Jul 2012	Kempinski Hotels SA (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-appeal dismissedKempinski's cross-appeal in CA 98 is dismissed. Kempinski is ordered to pay the costs of these appeals and the proceedings below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Kim Eng Securities v Goh Teng Poh: Dealer's Indemnity for Client Losses 06 Sep 2011 Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2011	Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for $512,004.89 (in respect of Julian) and for $703,878.65 (in respect of Goh) and for continuing interest on the principal amounts owing by both of them at the contractual rate of 9% per annum from 1 November 2009 until payment. Judgment also awarded for the legal costs incurred by the plaintiff in pursuing its claims against them in court at $8,731.70 (for Julian) and $8,043.14 (for Goh). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Hsu Ann Mei Amy v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Bank's Duty to Customer, Mental Capacity, Undue Influence 20 Jan 2011 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Respondent)Partial	20 Jan 2011	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Respondent): Appeal partially dismissedThe substantive appeal was dismissed, but the appeal on costs was allowed against them.
10	Goh Kah Heng v Public Prosecutor: Falsification, Misappropriation & False Information to Charities Commissioner 26 May 2010 Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Appellant)Partial	26 May 2010	Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.Appeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence allowed in part, with the aggregate imprisonment term reduced from 10 months to 6 months. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Bank's Duty of Care & Customer's Mental Capacity 24 May 2010 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Defendant)Won	24 May 2010	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court ruled in favor of the defendant, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Premium Automobiles v Song Gin Puay Ronnie: Employee's Entitlement to Performance Bonus Dispute 10 Nov 2009 Premium Automobiles Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	10 Nov 2009	Premium Automobiles Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed.
13	Goh Kah Heng v Public Prosecutor: Application to Transfer Trial to High Court 11 Mar 2009 Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Applicant)Lost	11 Mar 2009	Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to transfer the trial from the District Court to the High Court was dismissed.