Jasleen Kaur

Jasleen Kaur is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and director's duties. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil litigation and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Litigation	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Solicitor and Client Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasleen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jasleen Kaur has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Arbiters Inc Law Corporation	7 cases	100% of cases	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Legal Costs, Contentious Business Agreements, and Overcharging(Dec 2024) Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Taxation of Legal Fees in Negligence Suit(Jan 2024) Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Negligence Claim for Suicide of Salvin Foster Steven(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jasleen Kaur's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Consent	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14%
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jasleen Kaur's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Consent	1(14%)	14%
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	176,124.43	35,224.895 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Consent: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Legal Costs, Contentious Business Agreements, and Overcharging 04 Dec 2024 Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	04 Dec 2024	Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, with an uplift of $27,000 for professional fees and disbursements.
2	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Taxation of Legal Fees in Negligence Suit 30 Jan 2024 Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Applicant)Partial	30 Jan 2024	Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Applicant): Fees fixedThe court ordered that the applicant's fees be fixed at $60,000 inclusive of reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Negligence Claim for Suicide of Salvin Foster Steven 24 Aug 2023 Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff)Consent	24 Aug 2023	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff): Leave to discontinue suit grantedBy consent, the plaintiffs were given leave to discontinue this suit in accordance with the terms of settlement reached between them and the 1st and 3rd defendants.
4	Wee Ewe Seng v True Yoga: Breach of Employment Contract & Fiduciary Duty 25 Jul 2023 Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Appellant)Lost	25 Jul 2023	Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety.
5	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Director's Duties, Breach of Contract, and Wrongful Termination 04 Jul 2022 Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Defendant)Partial	04 Jul 2022	Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on unpaid salaryJudgment for Defendant on unpaid salary for the period of 1 January 2018 to 9 May 2018 at the rate of $22,500 per month. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Soh Keng Cheang Philip v National University Hospital: Clarification on Outstanding Hospital Bills 27 Oct 2021 Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Oct 2021	Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff): Counterclaim AllowedJudgment for the defendant on its counterclaim for outstanding hospital bills amounting to $26,463.73 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Soh Keng Cheang Philip v National University Hospital: Negligence Claim for Failure to Diagnose Cervical Myelopathy 25 Oct 2021 Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Oct 2021	Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).