Jasmine Kok

Jasmine Kok is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and margin call. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jasmine Kok has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Margin Call	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Derivatives	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wealth Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
FX Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jasmine Kok has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
MPillay	3 cases	75% of cases	ASG v ASH: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice & Costs(Jul 2016) Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG: Promissory Estoppel & FX Contract Closure(Sep 2012) Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in FX Trading(Nov 2010)
M Pillay	1 cases	25% of cases	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank: Wrongful FX Closure & Margin Calls(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jasmine Kok's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jasmine Kok's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	128,192.09	128,192.091 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ASG v ASH: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice & Costs 21 Jul 2016 ASH (Defendant)Won	21 Jul 2016	ASH (Defendant): Application to set aside the principal award dismissedApplication to set aside the principal award dismissed.
2	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG: Promissory Estoppel & FX Contract Closure 03 Sep 2012 Lam Chi Kin David (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	03 Sep 2012	Lam Chi Kin David (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partDamages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $128,192.09. The currency was amended from SGD to USD. Pre-judgment interest of 5.33% to commence from 2008-10-13. Assumed USD as the damages were initially recorded as SGD but intended to be in USD.
3	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in FX Trading 30 Nov 2010 Lam Chi Kin David (Appellant)Won	30 Nov 2010	Lam Chi Kin David (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appellant's appeal was allowed with costs. The appellant is entitled to damages, if any, to be assessed by the Registrar on the basis that the respondent was only entitled to close out his FX positions on 13 October 2008 at the earliest.
4	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank: Wrongful FX Closure & Margin Calls 09 Feb 2010 Lam Chi Kin David (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Feb 2010	Lam Chi Kin David (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for wrongful closure of FX positions was dismissed with costs. Assumed currency is Singapore Dollar (SGD) as the judgment originates from Singapore.