Jasmine Low

Jasmine Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jasmine Low has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domain Name Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Particular causes of action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jasmine Low has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	6 cases	100% of cases	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Directors Acting in Own Interests(Jun 2019) TWG Tea Co Pte Ltd v Murjani Manoj Mohan: Domain Name Ownership Dispute & Defamation Counterclaim(May 2019) Sunbreeze v Sim Chye Hock Ron: Minority Oppression, Third Party Proceedings, Amendment Application(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jasmine Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.5 parties avg	4.5	67%
Won	26.5 parties avg	6.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jasmine Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	116,500.00	29,125.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Directors Acting in Own Interests 24 Jun 2019 Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Other)Lost	24 Jun 2019	Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Other): Application dismissedSunbreeze opposed the winding up application, but the application was granted.
2	TWG Tea Co Pte Ltd v Murjani Manoj Mohan: Domain Name Ownership Dispute & Defamation Counterclaim 02 May 2019 Murjani Manoj Mohan (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	02 May 2019	Murjani Manoj Mohan (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaims DismissedCounterclaims for unjust enrichment and malicious falsehood are dismissed.
3	Sunbreeze v Sim Chye Hock Ron: Minority Oppression, Third Party Proceedings, Amendment Application 21 Oct 2018 Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2018	Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $35,000 to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Management Corporation v Mer Vue: Limitation in Building Defect Claims 12 Jun 2016 MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD (Respondent)Won	12 Jun 2016	MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent; costs awarded to the respondent.
5	W Y Steel Construction v Tycoon Construction: Leave to Proceed with Suit Against Company in Liquidation 21 Apr 2016 W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Apr 2016	W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for leave to proceed with Suit 112 was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the application fixed at $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Management Corporation v Mer Vue: Amendment of Pleadings and Limitation in Building Defect Claim 01 Mar 2016 MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent)Won	01 Mar 2016	MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantAppeal against the dismissal of the Plaintiff's application to amend its pleadings was dismissed; costs of $3,500 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the 1st Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.