Jasmine Tham

Jasmine Tham is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in schemes of arrangement and trust law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jasmine Tham has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and schemes of arrangement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Charitable trusts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Remuneration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wakaf	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jasmine Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jasmine Tham has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd v TT International Ltd: Assessment of Scheme Manager's Professional Fees(Oct 2018) Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura v Saeed Salman: Wakaf, Muslim Law & Charitable Trusts(Jan 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jasmine Tham's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jasmine Tham's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd v TT International Ltd: Assessment of Scheme Manager's Professional Fees 18 Oct 2018 nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Oct 2018	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Judge’s decision was dismissed.
2	Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura v Saeed Salman: Wakaf, Muslim Law & Charitable Trusts 10 Jan 2016 Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (Plaintiff)Won	10 Jan 2016	Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found in favor of the Plaintiff, granting the orders sought, namely: (a) a declaration that the Trust Properties are vested in the Plaintiff; (b) orders in respect of accounting by the Defendants and for the delivery of financial statements and other records; and (c) costs, charges and expenses of administering the Trust Properties to be paid out of the Trust Properties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.