Jason Chen

Jason Chen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason Chen has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason Chen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination(Jun 2021)
M/s Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	VBH Singapore Pte Ltd v Technobuilt Construction: Striking Out Claim for Lack of Reasonable Cause of Action(May 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason Chen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason Chen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination 13 Jun 2021 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	13 Jun 2021	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	VBH Singapore Pte Ltd v Technobuilt Construction: Striking Out Claim for Lack of Reasonable Cause of Action 06 May 2013 Second defendant (Defendant)Won	06 May 2013	Second defendant (Defendant): Application to strike out claim allowedThe second defendant's application to be struck out of the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim was allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.