Jason Lim

Jason Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason Lim has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-delegable duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Default Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Betting Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gaming Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason Lim has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Khoo & Partners	4 cases	40% of cases	CSR South East Asia v Sunrise Insulation: Default Judgment & Satisfaction of Debt(May 2002) Marina Tanker v Chan Fook Choon: Negligence Claim for Ship Engine Repair(Apr 2002) Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contracts under Singapore Civil Law Act(Feb 2002)
Straits Law Practice LLC	3 cases	30% of cases	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage(Sep 2017) Law Society v. Udeh Kumar: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Professional Conduct(Jun 2017) Rajendar Prasad Rai v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Order for Seizure of Property under Criminal Procedure Code(Mar 2017)
De Souza Lim & Goh LLP	2 cases	20% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v. Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin: Disciplinary Review for Mental Capacity & Overcharging(Jan 2020) Vicplas v Allfit: Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Conspiracy in Solvent Cement Market(Dec 2010)
Michael Khoo and Partners	1 cases	10% of cases	Gan Cheng Chan v Gan Meng Hui: Undue Influence & Intention in Family Contract(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Won	53.1 parties avg	3.1	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	42.4 parties avg	2.4
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	33.2 parties avg	3.2
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(40%)	40%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society of Singapore v. Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin: Disciplinary Review for Mental Capacity & Overcharging 07 Jan 2020 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	07 Jan 2020	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Appeal AllowedDetermination set aside; new Disciplinary Tribunal to be appointed.
2	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage 25 Sep 2017 Kho Sung Chin (Appellant)Lost	25 Sep 2017	Kho Sung Chin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants were ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Law Society v. Udeh Kumar: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Professional Conduct 26 Jun 2017 UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2017	UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent): Struck off the roll of advocates and solicitorsUdeh Kumar was ordered to be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors and to pay costs (including disbursements) to the Law Society in each of the Originating Summonses and the two hearings before the Tribunal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Rajendar Prasad Rai v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Order for Seizure of Property under Criminal Procedure Code 12 Mar 2017 Gurchandni Kaur Charan Singh (Applicant)Won	12 Mar 2017	Gurchandni Kaur Charan Singh (Applicant): Motion GrantedApplicant's motion to set aside the Magistrate's Order was granted.
5	Vicplas v Allfit: Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Conspiracy in Solvent Cement Market 23 Dec 2010 Loh Chin Leong Patrick (Defendant)Won	23 Dec 2010	Loh Chin Leong Patrick (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
6	Gan Cheng Chan v Gan Meng Hui: Undue Influence & Intention in Family Contract 17 Mar 2005 Gan Cheng Chan (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Mar 2005	Gan Cheng Chan (Plaintiff): Conditional leave to defend granted to the defendantConditional leave to defend granted to the defendant, provided she furnished security equivalent to the plaintiff’s claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	CSR South East Asia v Sunrise Insulation: Default Judgment & Satisfaction of Debt 12 May 2002 CSR South East Asia Pte Ltd (formerly known as CSR Bradford Insulation (S) Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	12 May 2002	CSR South East Asia Pte Ltd (formerly known as CSR Bradford Insulation (S) Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed. The court found that the default judgment was irregular. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Marina Tanker v Chan Fook Choon: Negligence Claim for Ship Engine Repair 04 Apr 2002 Kwok Ai Ing (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2002	Kwok Ai Ing (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant as regards liability and costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
9	Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contracts under Singapore Civil Law Act 24 Feb 2002 Tan Hong Woon (Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2002	Tan Hong Woon (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Star City was dismissed.
10	Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Gambling Debts under Singapore Civil Law Act 24 Feb 2002 Tan Hong Woon (Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2002	Tan Hong Woon (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court determined that the claim was essentially an action to recover money lost upon a wager, falling under Section 5(2) of the Civil Law Act and therefore unenforceable in Singapore. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.