Jason SC

Jason SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and production of documents. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason SC has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Certificate of costs for three solicitors	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason SC has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Lutfi Salim bin Talib v British and Malaysian Trustees: Specific Production & Common Interest Privilege(Mar 2024) First Property Holdings v U Myo Nyunt: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Delay(Dec 2020)
Allen & Gledhill LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Accounting for Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	301,395.37	100,465.123 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Accounting for Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds 01 Aug 2024 BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Aug 2024	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs of S$245,000 and disbursements of S$56,395.37 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Lutfi Salim bin Talib v British and Malaysian Trustees: Specific Production & Common Interest Privilege 24 Mar 2024 British and Malaysian Trustees Limited (Defendant)Partial	24 Mar 2024	British and Malaysian Trustees Limited (Defendant): Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in partAppeal allowed in part and dismissed in part; each party to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	First Property Holdings v U Myo Nyunt: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Delay 17 Dec 2020 First Property Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Dec 2020	First Property Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe court set aside the Default Judgment for the liquidated sum of US$585,143.67 and dismissed the rest of the defendant’s appeal against the AR’s decision. The court also dismissed the defendant’s application to set aside the Assessment Judgment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.