Jason Tan

Jason Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason Tan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	80% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Quek Loo Ming: Culpable Homicide and Poisoning Case(Aug 2002) Public Prosecutor v Yap Siew Luan: Drug Importation - Methamphetamine(Apr 2002) PP v Sivaraman Reddy Sivakumar: Culpable Homicide and Marital Dispute(Mar 2002)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	20% of cases	Syed Abdul Mutalip v PP: Retracted Confessions, Common Intention, and Drug Trafficking(May 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	52.2 parties avg	2.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	52.2 parties avg	2.2

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Quek Loo Ming: Culpable Homicide and Poisoning Case 04 Aug 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Aug 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused sentencedAccused sentenced to 9 years imprisonment for the first charge and 3 years imprisonment for the second charge, to run concurrently.
2	Syed Abdul Mutalip v PP: Retracted Confessions, Common Intention, and Drug Trafficking 16 May 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 May 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking.
3	Public Prosecutor v Yap Siew Luan: Drug Importation - Methamphetamine 29 Apr 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Apr 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Yap Siew Luan.
4	PP v Sivaraman Reddy Sivakumar: Culpable Homicide and Marital Dispute 12 Mar 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Mar 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Public Prosecutor v. Kanesan S/O Ratnam: Murder Conviction for Prison Inmate 27 Feb 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Feb 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty of murder.