Jason Tan Hin Wa

Jason Tan Hin Wa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction of Barges	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Tan Hin Wa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason Tan Hin Wa has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Asia Ascent Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Shipbuilding Contracts(Nov 2015) PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Setting Aside Default Judgment and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Barge Construction Dispute(Jul 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason Tan Hin Wa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason Tan Hin Wa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	173,500.00	86,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Shipbuilding Contracts 17 Nov 2015 PT Selecta Bestama (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	17 Nov 2015	PT Selecta Bestama (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; proceedings stayed in favor of Batam courts. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Setting Aside Default Judgment and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Barge Construction Dispute 29 Jul 2015 PT Selecta Bestama (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Jul 2015	PT Selecta Bestama (Plaintiff): Default judgment set aside on conditionDefault judgment set aside on condition that the Defendant pays $173,500 into court. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.