Jaswin Kaur Khosa

Jaswin Kaur Khosa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Internet Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Online Sale and Purchase	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Double Identity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Use of a sign	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offering goods for sale	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Antitrust and Trade Regulation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jaswin Kaur Khosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jaswin Kaur Khosa has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ravindran Associates	2 cases	67% of cases	Calvin Klein v HS International: Trade Mark Infringement & Online Sales(Oct 2016) Polo/Lauren Co LP v United States Polo Association: Trade Mark Dispute over Polo Player Device(Mar 2016)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Scotch Whisky Association v Isetan Mitsukoshi Ltd: Trade Mark Deception & Geographical Origin(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jaswin Kaur Khosa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jaswin Kaur Khosa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Scotch Whisky Association v Isetan Mitsukoshi Ltd: Trade Mark Deception & Geographical Origin 27 Aug 2019 Isetan Mitsukoshi Ltd (Respondent)Partial	27 Aug 2019	Isetan Mitsukoshi Ltd (Respondent): Appeal partially lostAppeal allowed on the ground that it is contrary to s 7(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act as the mark, when used for whisky that is not Scotch whisky, is of such a nature as to deceive the public as to its geographical origin. The respondent is ordered to pay costs to the appellant fixed at $5000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Calvin Klein v HS International: Trade Mark Infringement & Online Sales 02 Oct 2016 Calvin Klein Trademark Trust (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2016	Calvin Klein Trademark Trust (Plaintiff): Partial Summary Judgment GrantedSummary judgment granted against the Second Defendant, Global PSM Pte Ltd. Application for summary judgment against the First and Third Defendants disallowed.
3	Polo/Lauren Co LP v United States Polo Association: Trade Mark Dispute over Polo Player Device 07 Mar 2016 The Polo/Lauren Company, LP (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	07 Mar 2016	The Polo/Lauren Company, LP (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.