Jay Lee

Jay Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jay Lee has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
State Land Rules	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jay Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jay Lee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	67% of cases	Garden Hub v Attorney-General: Relief Against Forfeiture & State Tenancy Termination(Jan 2012) Huang Meizhe v Attorney-General: Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2011)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Ser Kim Koi v Fulton William Merrell: Discovery of Documents & Litigation Privilege(Feb 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jay Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	25.3 parties avg	5.3	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jay Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Garden Hub v Attorney-General: Relief Against Forfeiture & State Tenancy Termination 30 Jan 2012 Attorney-General (Defendant)Partial	30 Jan 2012	Attorney-General (Defendant): Partial victoryThe defendant's application to strike out the entire claim was partially successful, with the claims related to breach of contract and rectification being struck out.
2	Huang Meizhe v Attorney-General: Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Sentencing Appeal 21 Feb 2011 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	21 Feb 2011	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application struck outThe Attorney-General's application to strike out the originating summons was granted with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ser Kim Koi v Fulton William Merrell: Discovery of Documents & Litigation Privilege 12 Feb 2008 Ser Song Cheh (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Feb 2008	Ser Song Cheh (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe plaintiffs' appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision was dismissed in part.