Jeremy Tan

Jeremy Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and shares. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jeremy Tan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and minority oppression.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Domain Name Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discount on minority shares	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jeremy Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	TWG Tea Co Pte Ltd v Murjani Manoj Mohan: Domain Name Ownership Dispute & Defamation Counterclaim(May 2019) Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019) Leiman v. Noble Resources: Breach of Contract, Share Options & Fiduciary Duty(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jeremy Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 4 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	25%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	24.8 parties avg	4.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jeremy Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TWG Tea Co Pte Ltd v Murjani Manoj Mohan: Domain Name Ownership Dispute & Defamation Counterclaim 02 May 2019 Murjani Manoj Mohan (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	02 May 2019	Murjani Manoj Mohan (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaims DismissedCounterclaims for unjust enrichment and malicious falsehood are dismissed.
2	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 26 Mar 2019 Thio Syn San Serene (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2019	Thio Syn San Serene (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by each Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Leiman v. Noble Resources: Breach of Contract, Share Options & Fiduciary Duty 25 Jul 2018 Rothschild Trust Guernsey Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jul 2018	Rothschild Trust Guernsey Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
4	Thio Syn Kym Wendy v Thio Syn Pyn: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation in Malaysia Dairy Industries 12 Mar 2018 Thio Syn San Serene (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Mar 2018	Thio Syn San Serene (Plaintiff): Shares to be bought out without minority discountCourt ordered that no minority discount be applied to the sale of the plaintiff's shares in Malaysia Dairy Industries Pte Ltd. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.