Jeremy Yeo

Jeremy Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and statutory interpretation. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	21% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Case Disclosure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jeremy Yeo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022) Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General: Challenge to Section 377A Fails(Mar 2020) Goldring v. PP: Access to Seized Documents & Fair Trial Rights(Apr 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jeremy Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jeremy Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
2	Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General: Challenge to Section 377A Fails 29 Mar 2020 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	29 Mar 2020	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's application.
3	Goldring v. PP: Access to Seized Documents & Fair Trial Rights 24 Apr 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	24 Apr 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondent's arguments were rejected and the application was allowed.