Jeremy Yeo Shenglong

Jeremy Yeo Shenglong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and constitutional law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Human Sexuality	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contingent Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jeremy Yeo Shenglong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	100% of cases	Lim Seng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & CDSA Offences in Private Banking(Dec 2014) PP v Goldring: Common Law Right of Access to Seized Documents & Criminal Case Disclosure(Nov 2013) Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Loan to IMF under Article 144 of Constitution(Oct 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jeremy Yeo Shenglong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	62.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jeremy Yeo Shenglong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	5 14	Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Seng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & CDSA Offences in Private Banking 22 Dec 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	22 Dec 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe appeal was allowed in part, and the sentence was reduced.
2	PP v Goldring: Common Law Right of Access to Seized Documents & Criminal Case Disclosure 07 Nov 2013 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Neutral	07 Nov 2013	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): NeutralThe Public Prosecutor referred six questions of law for determination by the court.
3	Jeyaretnam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Loan to IMF under Article 144 of Constitution 30 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & LGBTQ Rights 01 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	01 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application was dismissed.
5	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	18 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Opposition UpheldThe Attorney-General's opposition to the application was upheld.
6	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights 08 Apr 2013 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	08 Apr 2013	Attorney-General (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that s 377A is unconstitutional and infringes their rights under Art 12 was dismissed.
7	Mohammad Faizal v PP: Constitutionality of Enhanced Drug Penalties 09 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Stated Question answered in the negativeThe court found the law constitutional and within the powers of the Legislature.
8	Amazi bin Hawasi v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of s 33A(5)(a) of Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Question answered in the negativeThe court determined that section 33A(5)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act does not violate the principle of separation of powers.