Jerome Robert

Jerome Robert is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international law and agency law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jerome Robert has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice11% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerome Robert has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jerome Robert has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	75% of cases	Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings(Mar 2008) WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions(Dec 2006) Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract(Jul 2006)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Undue Influence Claims(Feb 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jerome Robert's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Won	37.5 parties avg	7.5	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	28.3 parties avg	8.3
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jerome Robert's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	300.00	150.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Undue Influence Claims 26 Feb 2009 American Express Bank Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Feb 2009	American Express Bank Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent on a contractual basis.
2	Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings 23 Mar 2008 Aguamina Corporation (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2008	Aguamina Corporation (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Republic of the Philippines was ordered to bear 50% of the costs of the respondents in the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions 26 Dec 2006 Aguamina Corporation (Defendant)Won	26 Dec 2006	Aguamina Corporation (Defendant): WonThe Republic's application to stay the claims of the 2nd to 6th defendants was dismissed.
4	Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract 11 Jul 2006 Ang Tse Aun Damien (Defendant)Lost	11 Jul 2006	Ang Tse Aun Damien (Defendant): Nominal damages awarded against defendantNominal damages of $300 is awarded against the fourth defendant for breach of contract (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).