Jerrie Tan

Jerrie Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jerrie Tan has demonstrated expertise across 46 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expense Claims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerrie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jerrie Tan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	6 cases	40% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Rasheed Muhammad: Murder with Common Intention under Section 302(1) read with Section 34 of the Penal Code(Feb 2017) CCM Industrial Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Chan Pui Yee: Unfair Preference Claim in Insolvency(Oct 2016) Public Prosecutor v Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan: Illegally Importing Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	5 cases	33% of cases	Re PT Garuda Indonesia: Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceeding & Costs Dispute(Jun 2024) Koh Kien Chon v Ding Asset Ltd: Appeal for Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Aug 2023) Public Prosecutor v Jeganathan Balan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2022)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	13% of cases	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages(Jan 2019) BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project(Jul 2017)
Eugene Thuraisingam	2 cases	13% of cases	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Drugs, Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2015) James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel & Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation(May 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jerrie Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 4 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	103.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%
Won	33.7 parties avg	3.7	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2019	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jerrie Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	1(7%)	7%
Won	3(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,460,997.82	292,199.565 cases	5
USD	457,007.40	457,007.401 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re PT Garuda Indonesia: Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceeding & Costs Dispute 11 Jun 2024 Greylag Goose Leasing 1446 Designated Activity Company (Non-party)Lost	11 Jun 2024	Greylag Goose Leasing 1446 Designated Activity Company (Non-party): Unsuccessful party to bear costsGreylag Goose Leasing 1446 Designated Activity Company to pay applicants US$228,503.70 for costs of OA 5 and SUM 34 (assumed USD, as costs were claimed in USD).
2	Koh Kien Chon v Ding Asset Ltd: Appeal for Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 10 Aug 2023 Ding Asset Ltd (Respondent, Claimant)Won	10 Aug 2023	Ding Asset Ltd (Respondent, Claimant): WonCosts of S$8,000 awarded against the applicants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Public Prosecutor v Jeganathan Balan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Feb 2022 Jeganathan Balan (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2022	Jeganathan Balan (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedConvicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane.
4	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & PTSD 16 Sep 2020 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Applicant)Won	16 Sep 2020	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Applicant): Appeal AllowedConviction set aside and affirm the order of the High Court acquitting the Applicant of the trafficking charge.
5	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking, Fresh Evidence, PTSD & Impact on Statements 04 Jul 2019 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant)Neutral	04 Jul 2019	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant): Findings made on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal.The court made findings on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal.
6	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages 08 Jan 2019 Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Jan 2019	Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant): LostThe court found that BCBCS had the financial ability to fund KSC until the completion of commissioning and testing at the Tabang Plant or until June 2012.
7	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project 24 Jul 2017 Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Jul 2017	Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Repudiated Joint Venture DeedThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Public Prosecutor v Rasheed Muhammad: Murder with Common Intention under Section 302(1) read with Section 34 of the Penal Code 16 Feb 2017 Ramzan Rizwan (Defendant)Lost	16 Feb 2017	Ramzan Rizwan (Defendant): Guilty of murderFound guilty of murder with common intention under s 302(1) read with s 34 of the Penal Code.
9	CCM Industrial Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Chan Pui Yee: Unfair Preference Claim in Insolvency 17 Oct 2016 Chan Pui Yee (Defendant)Lost	17 Oct 2016	Chan Pui Yee (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court ordered the defendant to repay the sum of $766,799.45 to the Company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Public Prosecutor v Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan: Illegally Importing Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 15 May 2016 Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan (Defendant)Lost	15 May 2016	Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan (Defendant): ConvictionThe accused was convicted under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act for illegally importing not less than 67.49g of diamorphine into Singapore.
11	Piattchanine v Phosagro Asia: Wrongful Termination & Expense Claims Dispute 08 Oct 2015 IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Oct 2015	IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partPlaintiff was awarded S$649,200 pursuant to the Defendant’s termination of the Employment Contract without notice and S$33,998.37 for the outstanding annual bonus due to him for his first and completed year of employment.
12	Public Prosecutor v Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Rebuttal of Presumption 28 Jun 2015 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Respondent)Lost	28 Jun 2015	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Respondent): ConvictedThe Court of Appeal convicted the Respondent on the charge preferred against him.
13	Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd: Setting Aside Statutory Demand 14 Jun 2015 Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jun 2015	Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedPlaintiff's applications to extend time and set aside the Statutory Demand were dismissed with costs of $3000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	PP v Hamidah & Ilechukwu: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Drugs, Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Jan 2015 Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant)Won	07 Jan 2015	Ilechukwu Uchechukwu Chukwudi (Defendant): AcquittedIlechukwu was acquitted of trafficking not less than 1,963.3g of methamphetamine.
15	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel & Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation 27 May 2014 James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant)Lost	27 May 2014	James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant): Motion DismissedThe criminal motion filed by the Applicant was dismissed.