Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin

Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 35.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 41% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Probation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	7 cases	41% of cases	Lee Wee Ching v Wang Piao: Appealability of Summary Judgment Under Rules of Court 2021(Mar 2024) Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute(Oct 2023) Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Amendment of Defence Post-Summary Judgment(Aug 2023)
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	4 cases	24% of cases	Phosagro Asia v Piattchanine: Termination of Employment Contract for Serious Misconduct(Oct 2016) Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Bankruptcy & Statutory Demands(Apr 2016) Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment: Shareholder Reserve Powers & Director Deadlock(Aug 2015)
Straits Law Practice LLC	3 cases	18% of cases	Zetta Jet Pte Ltd & Anor v Asia Aviation Holdings: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings(Mar 2019) MatthewsDaniel International Pte Ltd v Kith Marine: Agency, Contractual Terms & Parol Evidence Rule(Mar 2018) Zetta Jet Pte Ltd: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings(Jan 2018)
Eugene Thuraisingam	3 cases	18% of cases	TYC Investment v Tay Yun Chwan: Shareholder Powers & Director Duties in Payment Disputes(Oct 2014) Leon Russel Francis v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession & Consumption - Probation Appeal(Aug 2014) James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel Upon Arrest & Access to Counsel(Jan 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 7 (41%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.7 parties avg	3.7	41%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Partial	34.0 parties avg	4.0	18%
Won	62.5 parties avg	2.5	35%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	34.7 parties avg	4.7
2015	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jerrie Tan Qiu Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(41%)	41%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	3(18%)	18%
Won	6(35%)	35%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	53,000.00	17,666.673 cases	3
USD	1,453,062.94	726,531.472 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Wee Ching v Wang Piao: Appealability of Summary Judgment Under Rules of Court 2021 24 Mar 2024 Lee Wee Ching (Appellant)Won	24 Mar 2024	Lee Wee Ching (Appellant): Application DismissedApplication to strike out the appeal was dismissed, and Mr. Wang was ordered to pay Mr. Lee the costs of the application fixed at $13,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Summary Judgment Appeal for US$1.95M Loan Dispute 02 Oct 2023 Lee Wee Ching (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2023	Lee Wee Ching (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against the summary judgment was dismissed.
3	Wang Piao v Lee Wee Ching: Amendment of Defence Post-Summary Judgment 03 Aug 2023 Lee Wee Ching (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2023	Lee Wee Ching (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant's application to amend his defence was dismissed.
4	Punithan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Evidence Discrepancies 30 Oct 2022 Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant)Won	30 Oct 2022	Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and appellant acquitted.
5	Punithan a/l Genasan v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Penal Code 12 Dec 2021 Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant)Neutral	12 Dec 2021	Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant): Original finding remains unaffectedOriginal finding that the Alleged Introductory Meeting took place on 12 October 2011 remains unaffected.
6	PP v S K Murugan: Voluntariness of Statements & Admissibility in Drug Trafficking Retrial 29 Jul 2021 S K Murugan Subrawmanian (Defendant)Won	29 Jul 2021	S K Murugan Subrawmanian (Defendant): Statements inadmissibleThe court held that the statements were made involuntarily and should not be admitted into evidence.
7	Public Prosecutor v Salzawiyah, Shisham, Jumadi: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2021 Jumadi bin Abdullah (Defendant)Lost	25 Jan 2021	Jumadi bin Abdullah (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of trafficking in diamorphine.
8	Zetta Jet Pte Ltd & Anor v Asia Aviation Holdings: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings 03 Mar 2019 Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener)Lost	03 Mar 2019	Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener): Intervention DismissedThe court granted the application for recognition of the US bankruptcy proceedings, effectively dismissing the intervener's objections.
9	MatthewsDaniel International Pte Ltd v Kith Marine: Agency, Contractual Terms & Parol Evidence Rule 27 Mar 2018 MATTHEWSDANIEL INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	27 Mar 2018	MATTHEWSDANIEL INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff's claim for USD 130,642.33, the total sum due under the Second, Third and Fourth Invoices together with interest amounting to USD 52,051.02, is allowed.
10	Zetta Jet Pte Ltd: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings 23 Jan 2018 Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener)Partial	23 Jan 2018	Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener): Partial LossThe court granted limited recognition to the Chapter 7 Trustee, but allowed the intervener to revisit arguments against wider recognition after proceedings in respect of the Singapore injunction.
11	Phosagro Asia v Piattchanine: Termination of Employment Contract for Serious Misconduct 27 Oct 2016 IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	27 Oct 2016	IOURI PIATTCHANINE (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partThe court affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the reimbursement of personal claims.
12	Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Bankruptcy & Statutory Demands 05 Apr 2016 Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Appellant)Lost	05 Apr 2016	Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $20,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent.
13	Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment: Shareholder Reserve Powers & Director Deadlock 12 Aug 2015 Chan Siew Lee (Appellant, Second Respondent)Partial	12 Aug 2015	Chan Siew Lee (Appellant, Second Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe scope of the reserve powers in this case does not extend to the matters set out at [81]–[86] above.
14	Timor Global v Equatorial Group: Breach of Contract for Coffee Beans 03 Aug 2015 Timor Global, LDA (Plaintiff)Won	03 Aug 2015	Timor Global, LDA (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,270,369.59, being the balance contract price of coffee beans sold and delivered.
15	TYC Investment v Tay Yun Chwan: Shareholder Powers & Director Duties in Payment Disputes 09 Oct 2014 Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Defendant)Lost	09 Oct 2014	Jannie Chan Siew Lee (Defendant): Required to pay costsRequired to pay TYC $20,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Leon Russel Francis v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession & Consumption - Probation Appeal 26 Aug 2014 Leon Russel Francis (Appellant)Won	26 Aug 2014	Leon Russel Francis (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment terms were substituted with a sentence of 24 months’ supervised probation.
17	James Raj v PP: Right to Counsel Upon Arrest & Access to Counsel 13 Jan 2014 James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant)Lost	13 Jan 2014	James Raj s/o Arokiasamy (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's motion for a declaration of an immediate right to counsel and an order for immediate access to counsel was dismissed.