Jessica Soo

Jessica Soo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jessica Soo has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fraud and deceit and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jessica Soo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jessica Soo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	2 cases	100% of cases	VisionHealthOne v HD Holdings: Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Jul 2012) Xing Rong Pte Ltd v Visionhealthone: Appeal on Discovery Order for Joint Venture Funds(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jessica Soo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jessica Soo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VisionHealthOne v HD Holdings: Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 23 Jul 2012 Xing Rong Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Jul 2012	Xing Rong Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Xing Rong Pte Ltd was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Xing Rong Pte Ltd v Visionhealthone: Appeal on Discovery Order for Joint Venture Funds 25 Aug 2010 Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) (Appellant)Partial	25 Aug 2010	Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against the striking out order was allowed, but the appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision was dismissed.