Jeya Putra

Jeya Putra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contested wills and insurance. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jeya Putra has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contested Wills	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Zoning, Planning and Land Use	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reinsurance Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jeya Putra has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
AsiaLegal LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	W&P Piling v Chew Yin What: Directors' Duties & Asset Transfers(Jul 2007) State of Johor v Tunku Alam Shah: Validity of Will & Bequest of 'State Property'(Aug 2005)
Island Law LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Subramaniam v Pandiyan: Rescission of Settlement Agreement Based on Misrepresentation Claim(Apr 2011)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	1 cases	25% of cases	Overseas Union Insurance v Turegum Insurance: Governing Law & Arbitration Clauses in Reinsurance Contracts(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jeya Putra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.3 parties avg	6.3	50%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jeya Putra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Subramaniam v Pandiyan: Rescission of Settlement Agreement Based on Misrepresentation Claim 27 Apr 2011 Vasandamallar Mrs Subramaniam (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	27 Apr 2011	Vasandamallar Mrs Subramaniam (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to strike out the statement of claim was dismissed.
2	W&P Piling v Chew Yin What: Directors' Duties & Asset Transfers 30 Jul 2007 W&P Piling Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2007	W&P Piling Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
3	State of Johor v Tunku Alam Shah: Validity of Will & Bequest of 'State Property' 30 Aug 2005 Daing Othman Bin Ibrahim (Defendant)Lost	30 Aug 2005	Daing Othman Bin Ibrahim (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court held that the defendants are not “persons interested” for the purposes of s 23 of the Land Acquisition Act and have no standing to appeal to the Appeals Board constituted under s 19 of the said Act.
4	Overseas Union Insurance v Turegum Insurance: Governing Law & Arbitration Clauses in Reinsurance Contracts 21 Jun 2001 Turegum Insurance Co (Defendant)Won	21 Jun 2001	Turegum Insurance Co (Defendant): Declarations GrantedTuregum succeeded on its counterclaim in relation to the existence of the contracts and the arbitration clauses. The court made declarations that the four reinsurance contracts are valid and subsisting and that each of the contracts contains an arbitration clause whereby parties have agreed to submit all disputes arising to arbitration in London.