Jimmy Goh

Jimmy Goh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in income taxation and international tax cooperation. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jimmy Goh has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and income taxation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	5 cases	22% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	5 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Taxation	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of Bank Statements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Jimmy Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jimmy Goh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore	3 cases	60% of cases	Comptroller of Income Tax v BLM: Disclosure of Bank Statements and Tax Examination vs. Tax Evasion Investigation(Oct 2013) BFC v Comptroller of Income Tax: Deduction of Borrowing Expenses & Income Tax Assessment(Sep 2013) Comptroller of Income Tax v AZP: Double Taxation Agreement & Exchange of Information(May 2012)
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)	2 cases	40% of cases	Comptroller of Income Tax v BKW: Exchange of Information under Singapore-India DTA(Oct 2013) BFH v Comptroller of Income Tax: Tax Treatment of Lump Sum Payment for Telecommunications Licence & Spectrum Rights(Aug 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jimmy Goh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	42.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jimmy Goh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,500.00	1,166.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Comptroller of Income Tax v BLM: Disclosure of Bank Statements and Tax Examination vs. Tax Evasion Investigation 16 Oct 2013 Comptroller of Income Tax (Plaintiff)Won	16 Oct 2013	Comptroller of Income Tax (Plaintiff): Application grantedThe application for disclosure of bank statements was granted.
2	Comptroller of Income Tax v BKW: Exchange of Information under Singapore-India DTA 03 Oct 2013 Comptroller of Income Tax (Applicant)Won	03 Oct 2013	Comptroller of Income Tax (Applicant): Application grantedApplication to release information granted; costs of $3,500 to the Comptroller (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	BFC v Comptroller of Income Tax: Deduction of Borrowing Expenses & Income Tax Assessment 08 Sep 2013 Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent)Won	08 Sep 2013	Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Comptroller, to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	BFH v Comptroller of Income Tax: Tax Treatment of Lump Sum Payment for Telecommunications Licence & Spectrum Rights 21 Aug 2013 Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent)Won	21 Aug 2013	Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the Respondent; appeal dismissed with costs.
5	Comptroller of Income Tax v AZP: Double Taxation Agreement & Exchange of Information 22 May 2012 Comptroller of Income Tax (Applicant)Dismissed	22 May 2012	Comptroller of Income Tax (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for production of records and information relating to Account 1 and Account 2 was dismissed.