Jin Shan

Jin Shan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in partnership law and construction law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jin Shan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and partnership law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jin Shan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jin Shan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow: Partnership Dispute over Mitre Hotel Sale Proceeds(May 2015) LH Aluminium v Newcon: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute(Nov 2014) Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow: Partnership Dispute over Mitre Hotel Sale Proceeds(Jun 2014)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Ang Cheng Guan Construction v Corporate Residence: Adjudication Review Scope under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act(Jan 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jin Shan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jin Shan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Cheng Guan Construction v Corporate Residence: Adjudication Review Scope under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 23 Jan 2017 Corporate Residence Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	23 Jan 2017	Corporate Residence Pte Ltd (Respondent): Adjudication Review Determination set asideAdjudication Review Determination set aside, with costs to be paid by CR to ACG. Costs are to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow: Partnership Dispute over Mitre Hotel Sale Proceeds 21 May 2015 CHIAM HENG HSIEN (Appellant)Partial	21 May 2015	CHIAM HENG HSIEN (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; the Judge’s decision below that the 1st and 2nd Respondents are partners of MHP is reversed. However, the decision that the 3rd and 4th Respondents are partners of MHP is affirmed. The parties’ respective shares in MHP is as follows: (a) The Appellant: 21/61 (b) The 3rd Respondent: 21/61 (c) The 4th Respondent: 19/61. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	LH Aluminium v Newcon: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute 27 Nov 2014 LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2014	LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chiam Heng Hsien v Chiam Heng Chow: Partnership Dispute over Mitre Hotel Sale Proceeds 25 Jun 2014 CHIAM HENG HSIEN (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jun 2014	CHIAM HENG HSIEN (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for the entire sale proceeds was dismissed.