Jinny Tan

Jinny Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and division of assets. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jinny Tan has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial contribution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indirect Contribution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Supply of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mediation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jinny Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jinny Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee, Tay & Lim LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Sita Jaswant Kaur v Surindar Singh: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce(Sep 2013) Yong Shao Keat v Foo Jock Khim: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance(May 2012)
Wee Tay & Lim	2 cases	40% of cases	Itochu Steel v CV Wira: Bills of Exchange Dishonor & Misrepresentation(Nov 2000) Poly Resources v Brani Readymixed: Granite Supply Dispute over Quantity and Delivery(Mar 2000)
Wee Tay and Lim	1 cases	20% of cases	Chan Hong Seng v Vatten: Assessment of Damages for Wrongful Repudiation(Oct 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jinny Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jinny Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,290,245.22	322,561.314 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sita Jaswant Kaur v Surindar Singh: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce 15 Sep 2013 Surindar Singh s/o Jaswant Singh (Defendant)Partial	15 Sep 2013	Surindar Singh s/o Jaswant Singh (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsReceived 50% of the matrimonial assets after the court rejected the settlement agreement. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Yong Shao Keat v Foo Jock Khim: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance 17 May 2012 Yong Shao Keat (Plaintiff)Partial	17 May 2012	Yong Shao Keat (Plaintiff): Division of Matrimonial AssetsThe Plaintiff received half of the total value of all matrimonial assets.
3	Chan Hong Seng v Vatten: Assessment of Damages for Wrongful Repudiation 25 Oct 2004 Vatten International Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	25 Oct 2004	Vatten International Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Damages to be assessedVatten was given interlocutory judgment for damages to be assessed in respect of the incomplete work.
4	Itochu Steel v CV Wira: Bills of Exchange Dishonor & Misrepresentation 29 Nov 2000 Tan Peng Boen @ Tansri S Benui (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2000	Tan Peng Boen @ Tansri S Benui (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Poly Resources v Brani Readymixed: Granite Supply Dispute over Quantity and Delivery 09 Mar 2000 Brani Readymixed Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 Mar 2000	Brani Readymixed Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for Defendant on its counterclaim for damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).