Joanna He

Joanna He is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and on-demand bonds.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joanna He has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
On-demand Bonds	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Applicable Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joanna He has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joanna He has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Shanghai Electric v PT Merak: Restraining Call on On-Demand Bond under English Law(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joanna He's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joanna He's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shanghai Electric v PT Merak: Restraining Call on On-Demand Bond under English Law 05 Jan 2010 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jan 2010	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for injunction dismissed.