Joanna Koh

Joanna Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 83% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joanna Koh has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joanna Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joanna Koh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew and Napier LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal(Dec 2005) Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005) Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation(May 2005)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	17% of cases	FE Global Electronics v Trek Technology: Patent Infringement, Purposive Claim Construction & Validity(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joanna Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 5 (83%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	33%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	34.3 parties avg	4.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	45.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joanna Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	FE Global Electronics v Trek Technology: Patent Infringement, Purposive Claim Construction & Validity 29 Dec 2005 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	29 Dec 2005	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal 05 Dec 2005 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	05 Dec 2005	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below. Security deposit to be released to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal 06 Oct 2005 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	06 Oct 2005	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal against DecisionTrek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd appealed against the decision to allow the application.
4	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation 11 May 2005 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	11 May 2005	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claims allowedTrek's claims in Suit 609/2002 and Suit 672/2002 were allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Mopi Pte Ltd v Central Mercantile Corp (S) Ltd: Discovery of Documents and Use in Separate Proceedings 25 Feb 2004 Mopi Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Feb 2004	Mopi Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedMopi's claim for passing off was dismissed.
6	Trek Technology v FE Global Electronics: Patent Rights Dispute & Discovery of Internal Emails 24 Aug 2003 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Aug 2003	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the right to make the discovery application was reserved before the trial judge.