Jocelyn Teo

Jocelyn Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attempted Statutory Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Posthumous Admission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jocelyn Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jocelyn Teo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	7 cases	100% of cases	Mohammad Azwan bin Bohari v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Application(Oct 2024) CRH v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Attempted Aggravated Statutory Rape Sentence & Applicability of Mandatory Minimum Sentence(Aug 2024) Re Vikram Kumar Tiwary: Posthumous Admission to the Singapore Bar(Sep 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jocelyn Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	37.7 parties avg	7.7	43%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jocelyn Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	3(43%)	43%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohammad Azwan bin Bohari v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Application 02 Oct 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Oct 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for stay of execution was dismissed.
2	CRH v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Attempted Aggravated Statutory Rape Sentence & Applicability of Mandatory Minimum Sentence 13 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
3	Re Vikram Kumar Tiwary: Posthumous Admission to the Singapore Bar 19 Sep 2021 Attorney-General (Respondent)Neutral	19 Sep 2021	Attorney-General (Respondent): NeutralNo objections to the application.
4	Public Prosecutor v Khoo Kwee Hock Leslie: Murder, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation, and Sudden Fight 16 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won	16 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant was convicted of murder.
5	Ho Man Yuk v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Misappropriation of Property and Statutory Interpretation 06 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe Court of Appeal answered the question in the negative and affirmed the convictions.
6	AXY v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Tax Information Exchange 01 Mar 2017 Attorney-General (Intervener)Neutral	01 Mar 2017	Attorney-General (Intervener): Application dismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; costs awarded to the Attorney-General's Chambers (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Re Wordsworth: Ad Hoc Admission for Lesotho's Investor-State Arbitration Challenge 28 Aug 2016 Attorney-General (Other)Neutral	28 Aug 2016	Attorney-General (Other): Application SupportedSupported the application for ad hoc admission.