Joel Raj Moosa

Joel Raj Moosa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and injunctions. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal fees	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Option Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed of Separation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Raj Moosa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joel Raj Moosa has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Inquiry into Damages for Freezing Order(Dec 2022) BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Dispute over Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds & Contractual Terms(Aug 2022) Radha Properties v Lim Poh Suan: Option Clause Enforceability & Prevailing Market Rate Dispute(Jun 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joel Raj Moosa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.9
Complex Cases: 5 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	38.4 parties avg	8.4	43%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	36.7 parties avg	6.7	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	47.7 parties avg	7.7
2022	35.7 parties avg	5.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joel Raj Moosa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	395,054.14	65,842.366 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Inquiry into Damages for Freezing Order 20 Dec 2022 Ponduver Pte Limited (Defendant)Lost	20 Dec 2022	Ponduver Pte Limited (Defendant): Application for inquiry as to damages declinedThe court declined to order an inquiry as to damages, and made no order as to costs of the fifth and sixth defendants’ application for such an inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Dispute over Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds & Contractual Terms 25 Aug 2022 Kim Byung Gun (Defendant)Partial	25 Aug 2022	Kim Byung Gun (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part for S$331,054.14 and KRW41,146,120. Assumed SGD, as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Radha Properties v Lim Poh Suan: Option Clause Enforceability & Prevailing Market Rate Dispute 13 Jun 2022 Chong Sian Cheen (Defendant)Won	13 Jun 2022	Chong Sian Cheen (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff to pay costs of S$8,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CGG v CGH: Appeal on Recovery of Legal Fees in Family Proceedings 22 Aug 2021 CGG (Appellant)Lost	22 Aug 2021	CGG (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondent costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000 (all-in) on a standard basis for two solicitors. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest 19 Aug 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “AROWANA MILAN” (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs order below is reversed in favor of the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Freezing Order Dispute in Mongolia Secret Profit Scheme 15 Apr 2021 Everest VC Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2021	Everest VC Pte Ltd (Defendant): Freezing order dischargedThe court discharged the freezing order against the sixth defendant.
7	Agency for Policy Coordination v Batbold: Authority to Act & Warrant in Civil Procedure 25 Feb 2021 Everest VC Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Feb 2021	Everest VC Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to discharge the injunction deniedThe court held that the plaintiffs are duly and properly represented by Rev Law, thus the application to discharge the injunction is denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.