Joel Wong En Jie

Joel Wong En Jie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act (pofma) and sentencing. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA)	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reckless Driving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal motions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joel Wong En Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joel Wong En Jie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	9 cases	100% of cases	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction(Jul 2022) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods(May 2022) Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joel Wong En Jie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	92.8 parties avg	2.8	100%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	62.9 parties avg	2.9
2022	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joel Wong En Jie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(90%)	90%
Partial	1(10%)	10%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	130,000.00	32,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	7 61	Lost: 6 cases (85.7%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%)
2022	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction 24 Jul 2022 Singapore Democratic Party (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	24 Jul 2022	Singapore Democratic Party (Applicant, Appellant): Application for permission to appeal dismissedThe SDP's application for permission to appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay the AG costs fixed at $6,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 09 May 2022 Singapore Democratic Party (Appellant)Lost	09 May 2022	Singapore Democratic Party (Appellant): Application DismissedSDP's application to set aside the Correction Direction was dismissed. SDP was ordered to pay the AG costs of $7,000 and reasonable disbursements to be fixed by the court if not agreed between the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Ong Ming Johnson (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Ong Ming Johnson (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
4	Wu Zhi Yong v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving & Reckless Driving Sentencing 18 Nov 2021 Wu Zhi Yong (Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2021	Wu Zhi Yong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
5	The Online Citizen v Attorney-General: POFMA, Freedom of Speech & Constitutional Law 07 Oct 2021 The Online Citizen Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	07 Oct 2021	The Online Citizen Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe court dismissed the appeal.
6	Miya Manik v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motions, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process 21 Sep 2021 Miya Manik (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	21 Sep 2021	Miya Manik (Appellant, Respondent): Criminal Motion DismissedCriminal Motion No 6 of 2021 seeking to adduce fresh evidence was dismissed.
7	Tan Hon Leong Eddie v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of CNB & AG Decisions on Drug Offenses 22 Aug 2021 Tan Hon Leong Eddie (Applicant)Lost	22 Aug 2021	Tan Hon Leong Eddie (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedings dismissed.
8	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave 01 Jul 2021 Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedLin's appeals were dismissed, and he was ordered to pay Tung $40,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Ang Jian Sheng Jonathan v Lyu Yan: Illegality and Public Policy in Cross-Border Remittance 22 Feb 2021 Lim Zhengde (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2021	Lim Zhengde (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $38,500 to the respondent.