Joelle Tan

Joelle Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in cross-border insolvency and contractual terms. Their track record shows a 58.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joelle Tan has demonstrated expertise across 58 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-party discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joelle Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joelle Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	11 cases	92% of cases	British Steamship v Thresh: Cross-Border Insolvency & COMI Determination(Oct 2024) Keppel DC Singapore 1 Ltd v DXC Technology Services: Contractual Term Dispute over Data Centre Services(Jan 2024) Re Thresh: Recognition of Bermuda Winding-Up Order under UNCITRAL Model Law(Nov 2023)
David Lim & Partners LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement(Dec 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joelle Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	17%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	73.2 parties avg	3.2	58%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	42.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2023	33.4 parties avg	3.4
2024	23.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joelle Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(17%)	17%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	7(58%)	58%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	167,000.00	41,750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British Steamship v Thresh: Cross-Border Insolvency & COMI Determination 23 Oct 2024 Michael Morrison (Respondent)Won	23 Oct 2024	Michael Morrison (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000 inclusive of disbursements were awarded to the JPLs to be paid by the appellants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Keppel DC Singapore 1 Ltd v DXC Technology Services: Contractual Term Dispute over Data Centre Services 11 Jan 2024 DXC Technology Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Jan 2024	DXC Technology Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant; the judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement 06 Dec 2023 Value Monetization III Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Dec 2023	Value Monetization III Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Lenders’ claim against CNP was dismissed.
4	Re Thresh: Recognition of Bermuda Winding-Up Order under UNCITRAL Model Law 29 Nov 2023 Michael Morrison (Applicant)Won	29 Nov 2023	Michael Morrison (Applicant): Application allowedApplication to recognise the proceedings before the Supreme Court of Bermuda allowed.
5	Mohd Sadique v Law Society & AG: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 04 Sep 2023 Mohd Sadique bin Ibrahim Marican (Applicant)Won	04 Sep 2023	Mohd Sadique bin Ibrahim Marican (Applicant): Reinstatement Application AllowedThe applicant's application for reinstatement to the Roll of advocates and solicitors was allowed, subject to certain conditions.
6	Haotanto v Fang: Application for Variation of Monthly Contribution and Target Contribution 13 Sep 2022 Haotanto Anna Vanessa (Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Sep 2022	Haotanto Anna Vanessa (Plaintiff): NeutralThe application by the defendant was dismissed.
7	DMX Technologies v Deloitte: Non-Party Discovery & Service Out of Jurisdiction 13 Sep 2022 DMX Technologies Group Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	13 Sep 2022	DMX Technologies Group Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal Dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in respect of the AR’s decision in Summons 2154.
8	DMX Technologies v Deloitte: Discovery Order Dispute on Document Enumeration and Inspection 27 Feb 2022 DMX Technologies Group Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Feb 2022	DMX Technologies Group Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Specific discovery orders made against PlaintiffPlaintiff is required to comply with paragraph 1 of the Discovery Order by filing and serving on the Defendant a fresh SLOD and Verifying Affidavit within 21 days. The fresh SLOD is to comply with the requirements in O 24 r 3(1) of the Rules of Court.
9	Year Sun v Gunvor: Setting Aside SIAC Award for Gasoil Contract Breach 12 Oct 2021 Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Oct 2021	Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, and costs of S$15,000 were awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital Management: Fiduciary Duties & Investment Agreement Dispute 23 Aug 2021 Gerald Yeo (Respondent, Defendant)Won	23 Aug 2021	Gerald Yeo (Respondent, Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims against Gerald Yeo were dismissed with costs fixed at $36,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	CIM v CIN: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Delivery of Clinker 31 Mar 2021 CIN (Defendant)Won	31 Mar 2021	CIN (Defendant): Originating summons dismissedThe court dismissed the originating summons, upholding the arbitration award in favor of CIN.
12	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital: Agent's Duties & Investment Advice 15 Feb 2021 Gerald Yeo (Defendant)Won	15 Feb 2021	Gerald Yeo (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claims dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.