Joethy Jeeva Arul

Joethy Jeeva Arul is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and negligence.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joethy Jeeva Arul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joethy Jeeva Arul has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
S K Kumar & Associates	1 cases	50% of cases	Ma HongFei v U-Hin Manufacturing: Negligence & Occupier's Liability in Workplace Injury(Jul 2009)
Swami & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Leads Engineering v Chin Choon: Garnishee Order Absolute for Construction Debt(Mar 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joethy Jeeva Arul's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joethy Jeeva Arul's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Lost	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	144,460.70	72,230.352 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ma HongFei v U-Hin Manufacturing: Negligence & Occupier's Liability in Workplace Injury 29 Jul 2009 U-Hin Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	29 Jul 2009	U-Hin Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Leads Engineering v Chin Choon: Garnishee Order Absolute for Construction Debt 04 Mar 2009 Chin Choon Co (Pte) Ltd (personal representatives of the estate of Choo Kok Hoe, deceased, garnishee) (Defendant)Lost	04 Mar 2009	Chin Choon Co (Pte) Ltd (personal representatives of the estate of Choo Kok Hoe, deceased, garnishee) (Defendant): Garnishee order nisi made absoluteGarnishee order nisi made absolute and order the garnishee to pay the plaintiff the judgment sum with interest. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.