John Abraham

John Abraham is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

John Abraham has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Films Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unnatural Sex (Fellatio)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Abraham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

John Abraham has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CrossBorders LLC	2 cases	29% of cases	PP v Mohamad Fadzli & Mohamed Affandi: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2017) Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016)
Crossborders LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Yazid: Trafficking and Abetting Diamorphine Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016) Public Prosecutor v Vejiyan: Drug Importation and Abetment of Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016)
John Abraham	2 cases	29% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal(Apr 2005) PP v Mohamed Noh Hafiz: Sentencing for Multiple Sex Offences and Robbery Involving Young Offenders(Sep 2003)
Christopher Bridges	1 cases	14% of cases	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation(Jun 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of John Abraham's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.2 parties avg	3.2	86%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of John Abraham's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(86%)	86%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Mohamad Fadzli & Mohamed Affandi: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Sep 2017 MOHAMAD FADZLI BIN AHMAD (Defendant)Lost	25 Sep 2017	MOHAMAD FADZLI BIN AHMAD (Defendant): Guilty of abetting Affandi to traffic DiamorphineFadzli was found guilty of abetting Affandi to have possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
2	Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Yazid: Trafficking and Abetting Diamorphine Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 31 May 2016 KALWANT SINGH A/L JOGINDAR SINGH (Defendant)Lost	31 May 2016	KALWANT SINGH A/L JOGINDAR SINGH (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty under s 5 of the Misuse of Drugs Act for trafficking in not less than 120.90g of diamorphine and for possession for the purpose of trafficking of not less than 60.15g of diamorphine.
3	Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 May 2016 Wasis bin Kalyubi (Defendant)Lost	22 May 2016	Wasis bin Kalyubi (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonmentThe Second Accused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to life imprisonment. No caning was imposed due to his age.
4	Public Prosecutor v Vejiyan: Drug Importation and Abetment of Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 May 2016 Razak Bin Dolla (Defendant)Lost	09 May 2016	Razak Bin Dolla (Defendant): Guilty as chargedRazak was found guilty of abetting the trafficking of not less than 22.41g of diamorphine through conspiracy.
5	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation 26 Jun 2007 Abd Malik Bin Usman (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2007	Abd Malik Bin Usman (Defendant): ConvictedFound guilty on the charge they faced, convicted them, and imposed the mandatory death sentence on them.
6	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal 21 Apr 2005 S Manogaran (Other)Neutral	21 Apr 2005	S Manogaran (Other): -
7	PP v Mohamed Noh Hafiz: Sentencing for Multiple Sex Offences and Robbery Involving Young Offenders 11 Sep 2003 Mohamed Noh Hafiz bin Osman (Accused)Lost	11 Sep 2003	Mohamed Noh Hafiz bin Osman (Accused): Accused SentencedAccused sentenced to 20 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.