Johnny Cheo Chai Beng

Johnny Cheo Chai Beng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Johnny Cheo Chai Beng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	Tan Jin Sin v Lim Quee Choo: Dependent vs Independent Obligations in Contract Law(Mar 2009) Goh Eng Wah v Daikin Industries: Incentive Scheme Dispute & Contractual Obligations(Oct 2008) Lim Quee Choo v Tan Jin Sin: Enforceability of Undertaking for Share Transfer(Aug 2008)
Cheo Yeoh and Associates LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Swiss Butchery Pte Ltd v Huber Ernst: Breach of Director's Duties and Conspiracy(Apr 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Johnny Cheo Chai Beng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Johnny Cheo Chai Beng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,097,654.00	365,884.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Swiss Butchery Pte Ltd v Huber Ernst: Breach of Director's Duties and Conspiracy 26 Apr 2010 Huber Ernst (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2010	Huber Ernst (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the first to fifth defendants for damages to be assessed or an account for profits. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tan Jin Sin v Lim Quee Choo: Dependent vs Independent Obligations in Contract Law 05 Mar 2009 Lim Quee Choo (Respondent)Lost	05 Mar 2009	Lim Quee Choo (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the initial judgment in her favor was overturned.
3	Goh Eng Wah v Daikin Industries: Incentive Scheme Dispute & Contractual Obligations 30 Oct 2008 Goh Eng Wah (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Oct 2008	Goh Eng Wah (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed against the third defendant (Robert Chua Teck Chew) for breach of the terms of the Incentive Scheme. Monetary amount is in Singapore Dollars, the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Lim Quee Choo v Tan Jin Sin: Enforceability of Undertaking for Share Transfer 14 Aug 2008 Lim Quee Choo (Plaintiff)Won	14 Aug 2008	Lim Quee Choo (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffThe 1st and 2nd defendants were ordered to transfer their 1.5 million Dauphin shares to the plaintiff for a consideration of $1.00 and to pass all resolutions and do all things necessary to effect the registration of the transfer of the said shares to the plaintiff within 2 weeks. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.