Joleen Wong Ying

Joleen Wong Ying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wrongful termination and striking out.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joleen Wong Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joleen Wong Ying has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JWS Asia Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	See Jen Sen v Prudential Assurance: Appeal on Striking Out Claims for Wrongful Termination and Unjust Enrichment(Mar 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joleen Wong Ying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joleen Wong Ying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	See Jen Sen v Prudential Assurance: Appeal on Striking Out Claims for Wrongful Termination and Unjust Enrichment 17 Mar 2024 Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	17 Mar 2024	Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the AR's orders to strike out the UE claim and the UCTA claim was allowed. Costs reserved to the trial judge. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).