Jolene Tan

Jolene Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jolene Tan has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Annulment of bankruptcy order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jolene Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jolene Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sterling Law Corporation	7 cases	100% of cases	Goh Kar Tuck v Koh Samuel: Specific Performance for Property Sale Dispute(Jul 2022) Ong Chin Woon v Ong Bee Hah: Constructive & Resulting Trusts Dispute Over Family Property(May 2022) New Ping Ping Pauline v Eng’s Noodles House: Common Law Derivative Action, Conspiracy, Fiduciary Duty Breach(Dec 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jolene Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	45.8 parties avg	5.8	57%
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2020	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2022	24.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jolene Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Kar Tuck v Koh Samuel: Specific Performance for Property Sale Dispute 13 Jul 2022 Teh Yiok Moi (Claimant)Won	13 Jul 2022	Teh Yiok Moi (Claimant): Specific performance grantedSpecific performance granted, ordering the defendant to sell and transfer the property to the claimant.
2	Ong Chin Woon v Ong Bee Hah: Constructive & Resulting Trusts Dispute Over Family Property 23 May 2022 Ong Chin Woon (Plaintiff)Lost	23 May 2022	Ong Chin Woon (Plaintiff): Claim dismissed with costsPlaintiff's claim dismissed with costs on a standard basis.
3	New Ping Ping Pauline v Eng’s Noodles House: Common Law Derivative Action, Conspiracy, Fiduciary Duty Breach 21 Dec 2020 New Ping Ping Pauline (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Dec 2020	New Ping Ping Pauline (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for conspiracy to injure the company and breach of fiduciary duties was dismissed.
4	Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v Machlogic Singapore Pte Ltd: Enforcing Arbitration Award Despite Fraud Allegations 21 Oct 2020 Machlogic Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2020	Machlogic Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe applicant's application to set aside the ex parte order granting the applicant leave to enforce the award was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Standard Chartered Bank v Chua Seng Kiat: Annulment of Bankruptcy Order Before Debt Proven 08 Oct 2019 Lim Peng Liang David Llewellyn (Intervener)Lost	08 Oct 2019	Lim Peng Liang David Llewellyn (Intervener): Appeal DismissedThe intervener's appeal against the annulment of the bankruptcy order was dismissed.
6	Lim Ah Leh v Heng Fock Lin: Resulting Trust, Fiduciary Duties, and Limitation Act 11 Apr 2019 Heng Fock Lin (Respondent, Defendant)Won	11 Apr 2019	Heng Fock Lin (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
7	Liu Yanzhe v Tan Eu Jin: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Autostyle Investment 20 Mar 2019 Ma Yanzhi (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Mar 2019	Ma Yanzhi (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim against the fourth defendant, Lim Hung Kok, is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.