Jolyn Francisca de Roza

Jolyn Francisca de Roza is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical malpractice and medical ethics. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in healthcare law and medical malpractice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Healthcare Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Jolyn Francisca de Roza has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jolyn Francisca de Roza has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct and Ethical Obligations of Medical Practitioners(Jun 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jolyn Francisca de Roza's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jolyn Francisca de Roza's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct and Ethical Obligations of Medical Practitioners 27 Jun 2013 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2013	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Disciplinary Committee's decision to suspend the appellant was upheld.