Jonathan Lim

Jonathan Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and employment law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jonathan Lim has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bonus Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jonathan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jonathan Lim has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Schuler v New Era of Networks: Wrongful Dismissal & Bonus Dispute(Sep 2002)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022)
Premier Law LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd: Negligence, Bailment, Contractual Exclusion Clauses & Fire Damage(Feb 2021)
Sim & Wong LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Rickshaw Investments v Nicolai Von Uexkull: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Contractual Disputes(Apr 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jonathan Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	113.0 parties avg	13.0	25%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jonathan Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	320,240.00	106,746.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Applicant)Partial	13 Mar 2022	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Applicant): PartialThe court held that the judicial management expenses principle generally did not apply to the claims arising out of the vessels that were the subject of SUM 2085, subject to certain exceptions. Costs were awarded to Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd: Negligence, Bailment, Contractual Exclusion Clauses & Fire Damage 01 Feb 2021 UBTS Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Feb 2021	UBTS Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial Judgment AgainstJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded in the amount of $248,240.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Rickshaw Investments v Nicolai Von Uexkull: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Contractual Disputes 26 Apr 2006 Nicolai Baron Von Uexkull (Defendant, Appellant)Won	26 Apr 2006	Nicolai Baron Von Uexkull (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal to stay the Singapore action was allowed.
4	Schuler v New Era of Networks: Wrongful Dismissal & Bonus Dispute 18 Sep 2002 New Era of Networks (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 Sep 2002	New Era of Networks (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment on CounterclaimJudgment in the sum of $72,000 on the Defendant’s counterclaim, with interest at the usual rate from the date of the filing of the counterclaim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.