Joni Tan

Joni Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and property law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joni Tan has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joni Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joni Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Chiang Sing Jeong v Treasure Resort: Shareholding Dispute & Express Trust Claim(Jul 2013) Chua June Ching Michelle v Chai Hoi Tong: Adverse Possession Claim Over Amoy Street Property(Jul 2011) Chua Say Eng v Lee Wee Lick Terence: SOPA Adjudication Determination Dispute(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joni Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joni Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chiang Sing Jeong v Treasure Resort: Shareholding Dispute & Express Trust Claim 04 Jul 2013 Café Aquarium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Jul 2013	Café Aquarium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Loan to be paidMDG to pay the outstanding balance of the Loan to Café.
2	Chua June Ching Michelle v Chai Hoi Tong: Adverse Possession Claim Over Amoy Street Property 28 Jul 2011 Chua June Ching Michelle (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jul 2011	Chua June Ching Michelle (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe Plaintiff was declared the owner of the property and the Registrar of Titles was ordered to register her as the proprietor of the Property.
3	Chua Say Eng v Lee Wee Lick Terence: SOPA Adjudication Determination Dispute 28 Apr 2011 Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs and disbursements to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chua Say Eng v Lee Wee Lick Terence: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Security of Payment Act 10 Nov 2010 Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Nov 2010	Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe defendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.