Jordan Li

Jordan Li is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jordan Li has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences Relating to Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Payment Services Act 2019	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money Transfer Services	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fintech	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Casino Control Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheating at Play	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jordan Li has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jordan Li has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Vijay Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Unlicensed Money Transfer Services & Sentencing Framework under Payment Services Act(Apr 2023) Leck Kim Koon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, Penal Code s 420, Sentencing Principles & Ill Health(Oct 2021) Logachev Vladislav v Public Prosecutor: Cheating at Play & Casino Control Act Sentencing(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jordan Li's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jordan Li's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vijay Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Unlicensed Money Transfer Services & Sentencing Framework under Payment Services Act 20 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence AffirmedThe original sentence of two weeks’ imprisonment was affirmed.
2	Leck Kim Koon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, Penal Code s 420, Sentencing Principles & Ill Health 19 Oct 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Oct 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Logachev Vladislav v Public Prosecutor: Cheating at Play & Casino Control Act Sentencing 18 Jan 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Jan 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially upheld, as the appeal was allowed only in part and the conviction was maintained.