Joseph Tang

Joseph Tang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Tang has demonstrated expertise across 171 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Contract Law4 cases
Property Law3 cases
Best Efforts Clause3 cases
Breach of Contract3 cases
Guarantees and indemnities3 cases
Law of Pleadings2 cases
Sham Transaction2 cases
Restructuring and Insolvency2 cases
Banking and Finance2 cases
Banking Law2 cases
Guarantees2 cases
Admiralty and Maritime Law2 cases
Arbitration2 cases
Mortgage Law2 cases
Guarantee2 cases
Shipping Law2 cases
Bailment1 cases
Ship Mortgage1 cases
Interpretation of contractual terms1 cases
Performance of Contract1 cases
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act1 cases
Bank Guarantee1 cases
Condition Precedent1 cases
Sale Pendente Lite1 cases
Rules of Court 20211 cases
Construction of Contract1 cases
International Trade Law1 cases
Interpretation of Contract1 cases
Construction of Contracts1 cases
Breach of Contractual Warranties1 cases
Repudiation of contract1 cases
Breach of Contractual Terms1 cases
Interpretation of Contracts1 cases
Entire Agreement Clause1 cases
Offer and Acceptance1 cases
Frustration of Contract1 cases
Enforcement of Guarantee1 cases
Conditions Precedent1 cases
Estoppel by Convention1 cases
Sale of Property1 cases
Lending and security1 cases
Unfair Contract Terms Act1 cases
General Principles1 cases
Inducing Breach of Contract1 cases
Common Law Rectification1 cases
Equitable Rectification1 cases
Party Autonomy1 cases
Double Separability1 cases
Guarantor1 cases
Warranties1 cases
Sham Contract1 cases
Abuse of Trust1 cases
Intention of Parties1 cases
Deeds1 cases
Consent Order1 cases
Riddick Undertaking1 cases
Assignment and attachment of money held in bank1 cases
Letter of undertaking1 cases
Piercing corporate veil1 cases
Nominee Purchase Arrangement1 cases
Contractual Remedies1 cases
Setting aside enforcement order1 cases
Incorporation of Terms1 cases
Equitable Set-Off1 cases
Validity of settlement agreement containing arbitration clause1 cases
Termination of Contract1 cases
Consideration1 cases
Breach1 cases
Breach of condition1 cases
Requirements for waiver by election1 cases
Communication of choice to affirm contract in clear and unequivocal terms1 cases
Novation1 cases
Proper Law of Contract1 cases
Contractual Variation1 cases
Deed of Indemnity1 cases
Implied authority of agent1 cases
Tort1 cases
Privity of contract1 cases
Existence of arbitration agreement1 cases
Assignment and novation of arbitration agreement1 cases
Invalidity of arbitration agreement1 cases
Inconsistency between arbitration agreement and jurisdiction clause1 cases
Composition of tribunal not in accordance with agreement1 cases
Contractual estoppel1 cases
Implied contract1 cases
Proper Law1 cases
Legal Ethics1 cases
Unilateral mistake1 cases
Discharge Voucher1 cases
Assignments1 cases
Price Reduction Agreements1 cases
Completion Contracts1 cases
Agency Agreements1 cases
SEAPA Contract1 cases
Compromise Agreement1 cases
Contracts of indemnity1 cases
Sufficiency of consideration1 cases
Indemnity1 cases
Pre-contract deposits1 cases
Estoppel in defiance of statute1 cases
Bars to rescission1 cases
Mashed Potato Agreement1 cases
Marriage Agreement1 cases
Inducement1 cases
Consent Judgment1 cases
Oral agreements1 cases
Indian Contract Act1 cases
Variation of Contract1 cases
Matrimonial Consent Order1 cases
Postal Rule1 cases
Terms1 cases
Ground for termination of contract1 cases
Admiralty Jurisdiction1 cases
Formalities1 cases
Arbitrability1 cases
Commercial Transactions1 cases
Principal1 cases
Construction of undertaking1 cases
Warranty1 cases
Admissions of fact1 cases
Validity of arbitral award1 cases
Contingency Fee Agreement1 cases
Rights of agent1 cases
Formation1 cases
Effect of counterclaim1 cases
Shareholder Agreements1 cases
Settlement Negotiations1 cases
Letter of Demand1 cases
Implied Admission1 cases
Separability Doctrine1 cases
International Commercial Transactions1 cases
Lease Agreement1 cases
Promissory Notes1 cases
Implied contracts1 cases
Shareholder's Meeting1 cases
Director's Resolution1 cases
Blanket Authorisation1 cases
Delegation of Duties1 cases
Restitution for wrongs1 cases
Design and build contract1 cases
Agency by estoppel1 cases
Oral undertaking1 cases
Pre-incorporation contracts1 cases
Derivatives Law1 cases
Margin Trading1 cases
Financial Crisis1 cases
Shipbuilding1 cases
Writ in rem1 cases
Breach of Guarantee1 cases
Non-reliance clause1 cases
Assignment of Contractual Rights1 cases
Tortious Interference1 cases
Wrongful Interference with Trade1 cases
Duty of fidelity1 cases
Good Faith1 cases
Ship Finance1 cases
Arrest of Vessel1 cases
Asset Recovery1 cases
Business Litigation1 cases
Commercial Litigation1 cases
Contracts1 cases
International Law1 cases
Private International Law1 cases
Real Estate1 cases
Commercial Disputes1 cases
Jurisdiction1 cases
Unjust Enrichment1 cases
Sanctions Law1 cases
Foreign Law1 cases
Estoppel1 cases
Conversion1 cases

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Tang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Tang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
5.2
Complex Cases
3 (75%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost16.0 parties avg
Partial19.0 parties avg
Stayed13.0 parties avg
Won15.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201115.0 parties avg
201219.0 parties avg
201416.0 parties avg
201513.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Tang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(25%)
Partial1(25%)
Stayed1(25%)
Won1(25%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
USD203,855,277.001 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20111
1
20121
1
20141
1
20151
1

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

Case
29 Dec 2015
Grains and Industrial Products Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Stayed
06 Feb 2014
Alpha Bank S.A. (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost
29 Jul 2012
ANTARIKSA LOGISTICS PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Partial
30 Jan 2011
Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (Plaintiff)Won