Joseph Tay

Joseph Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contract law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Tay has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Tay has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd(Aug 2013) OCBC Capital Investment v Wong Hua Choon: Oral Agreement & Intention to Be Bound(Feb 2012)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 21 May 2018 Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	21 May 2018	Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision to grant a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration and to set aside the ex parte order granting leave to serve out of jurisdiction was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd 19 Aug 2013 HRT Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Aug 2013	HRT Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffCourt ordered Wong to rectify the share register of NCPL to reflect HRT's entitlement to 33% of the shareholding in NCPL (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	OCBC Capital Investment v Wong Hua Choon: Oral Agreement & Intention to Be Bound 02 Feb 2012 OCBC Capital Investment Asia Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Feb 2012	OCBC Capital Investment Asia Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOCBC Capital Investment Asia Ltd's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.