Joseph Tham Chee Ming

Joseph Tham Chee Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Equitable Allowance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tham Chee Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Tham Chee Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	100% of cases	Innovative Corp Pte Ltd v Ow Chun Ming: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits for Eleven@Holland Project(Sep 2022) Tan Kian Seng v Venture Corporation: Breach of Contract & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Share Benefits Dispute(Nov 2021) Law Society of Singapore v G B Vasudeven: Disciplinary Proceedings for Grossly Improper Conduct and Forgery(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Tham Chee Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Tham Chee Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	87,129,319.32	29,043,106.443 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Innovative Corp Pte Ltd v Ow Chun Ming: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits for Eleven@Holland Project 22 Sep 2022 Innovative Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Sep 2022	Innovative Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the second defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $84,548,250.96 and the first defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $2,581,068.36 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tan Kian Seng v Venture Corporation: Breach of Contract & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Share Benefits Dispute 24 Nov 2021 Tan Kian Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Nov 2021	Tan Kian Seng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract and misrepresentation was dismissed.
3	Law Society of Singapore v G B Vasudeven: Disciplinary Proceedings for Grossly Improper Conduct and Forgery 13 Aug 2019 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	13 Aug 2019	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order for Respondent to be struck offThe court ordered that the respondent be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors and awarded costs of the proceedings to the Law Society. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.