Joseph Theseira

Joseph Theseira is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Theseira has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Epilepsy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Theseira has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Theseira has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Naidu Mohan & Theseira	2 cases	50% of cases	Lasry Lex QC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Res Judicata in Capital Offense Case(Nov 2003) Public Prosecutor v Lim Hock Hin: Culpable Homicide, Mental Impairment, and Sentencing(Jul 2002)
Joseph Theseira	1 cases	25% of cases	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights(Oct 2004)
Naidu Mohan and Theseira	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Theseira's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 1.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	41.8 parties avg	1.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Theseira's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Oct 2004 Nguyen Tuong Van (Appellant)Lost	19 Oct 2004	Nguyen Tuong Van (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
2	PP v Nguyen Tuong Van: Mandatory Death Penalty & Constitutional Rights 19 Mar 2004 Nguyen Tuong Van (Defendant)Lost	19 Mar 2004	Nguyen Tuong Van (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to deathAccused found guilty and convicted; sentenced to death.
3	Lasry Lex QC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Res Judicata in Capital Offense Case 19 Nov 2003 Lex Lasry (Applicant)Lost	19 Nov 2003	Lex Lasry (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for ad hoc admission was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Lim Hock Hin: Culpable Homicide, Mental Impairment, and Sentencing 14 Jul 2002 Lim Hock Hin (Defendant)Lost	14 Jul 2002	Lim Hock Hin (Defendant): Life ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment with a direction for regular treatment of his illness.