Joseph Yeo

Joseph Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in guarantees and indemnities and trust law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and guarantee.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intimidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Yeo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	CIFG v Polimet: Summary Judgment & Striking Out Application on Bond Subscription Agreement & Indemnity Clause(Apr 2014) Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust Claim, Blackmail, Tort of Intimidation and Harassment(Jan 2013) Kim Eng Securities v Goh Teng Poh: Dealer's Indemnity for Client Losses(Sep 2011)
KhattarWong	1 cases	20% of cases	S Y Technology Inc v Pacific Recreation: Choice of Law & Indemnity Enforcement(Mar 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	80%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,883,667.38	470,916.854 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CIFG v Polimet: Summary Judgment & Striking Out Application on Bond Subscription Agreement & Indemnity Clause 15 Apr 2014 CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited) (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Apr 2014	CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust Claim, Blackmail, Tort of Intimidation and Harassment 23 Jan 2013 Tee Yok Kiat (Appellant)Won	23 Jan 2013	Tee Yok Kiat (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in its entirety. Judgment for $608,700 (Trust Claim) and $50,000 (Blackmail Claim) with interest at 3% from the date of filing the Writ of Summons. Costs of the appeal, SUM 4377, and the proceedings below awarded to Sarah. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Kim Eng Securities v Goh Teng Poh: Dealer's Indemnity for Client Losses 06 Sep 2011 Goh Teng Poh Karen (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2011	Goh Teng Poh Karen (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for $512,004.89 (in respect of Julian) and for $703,878.65 (in respect of Goh) and for continuing interest on the principal amounts owing by both of them at the contractual rate of 9% per annum from 1 November 2009 until payment. Judgment also awarded for the legal costs incurred by the plaintiff in pursuing its claims against them in court at $8,731.70 (for Julian) and $8,043.14 (for Goh). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	ANB v ANF: Defamation, O 14 r 12, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Justification Defence 02 Nov 2010 ANB (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Nov 2010	ANB (Plaintiff): Unconditional leave to defend granted to defendantThe defendant raised a triable defence of justification and the plaintiff is therefore not entitled to summary judgment.
5	S Y Technology Inc v Pacific Recreation: Choice of Law & Indemnity Enforcement 20 Mar 2007 Pacific Association Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2007	Pacific Association Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up orderOrder made that the defendant, Pacific Association Pte Ltd, be wound up. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.