Josephine Low

Josephine Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 37 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and banking law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 16 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Josephine Low has demonstrated expertise across 125 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	22 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 22 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	12 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Aviation Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal representatives	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tomlin Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed Moneylender	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Retainer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligent Advice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness of Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Benevolence Principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Purchase Money Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Advance Fee Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
419 Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nigerian Scam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banker Customer Relationship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Takeover Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contribution Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vendor's Lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Takeover	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Air Crash Investigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aircraft Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warsaw Convention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aviation Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
CPF Nomination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Powers of Attorney	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Josephine Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Josephine Low has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 28 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Khoo & Partners	28 cases	76% of cases	Lim Lai Soon v Tan Hong Sin: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Patents Dispute(Nov 2022) HQH Capital Ltd v Chen Liping: Tomlin Orders, Enforcement, and Validity(Sep 2022) Chye Seng Kait v Chye Seng Fong: Executor's Duty, Estate Assets & Will Construction(Apr 2021)
Michael Khoo and Partners	7 cases	19% of cases	Fan Juan Fen v Crocodile Holdings: Share Transfer, Dividends & Fraud Allegations(Aug 2005) Oei Hong Leong v Ban Song Long David: Defamation, Fair Comment & Corporate Takeover(Jul 2005) OCBC v Tan Teck Khong: Mortgage Enforceability & Undue Influence in Property Transaction(Mar 2005)
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	1 cases	3% of cases	Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit: Res Judicata, Constructive Trusts & Amending Pleadings(Jan 2000)
Andrew Ee & Co	1 cases	3% of cases	Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Bank's Duty of Care & Customer's Mental Capacity(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Josephine Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 16 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Lost	204.0 parties avg	4.0	54%
Partial	65.2 parties avg	5.2	16%
Won	114.9 parties avg	4.9	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	56.7 parties avg	6.7
2001	53.8 parties avg	3.8
2002	23.6 parties avg	3.6
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	53.9 parties avg	3.9
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Josephine Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	20(53%)	53%
Partial	6(16%)	16%
Won	11(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,180,791.34	261,299.4616 cases	16
USD	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2001	5 122	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 37 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Lai Soon v Tan Hong Sin: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Patents Dispute 17 Nov 2022 Tan Siew Hui (Defendant)Partial	17 Nov 2022	Tan Siew Hui (Defendant): Partial LossThe court found that the first defendant held shares beneficially for himself.
2	HQH Capital Ltd v Chen Liping: Tomlin Orders, Enforcement, and Validity 11 Sep 2022 Chen Liping (Defendant)Lost	11 Sep 2022	Chen Liping (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantFinal Judgment be entered against Ms Chen on the Revised Tomlin Order dated 9 May 2016 for the sum of $1,454,274.46 (being the sum of $3.25m less sums paid by Ms Chen to date), along with interest thereon and on all late instalment payments at the aggregate sum of $496,816.88 (as at 31 March 2022 and continuing). Ms Chen to pay HQH costs of $50,000 pursuant to clause (c) of the Schedule to the Revised Tomlin Order dated 9 May 2016. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chye Seng Kait v Chye Seng Fong: Executor's Duty, Estate Assets & Will Construction 19 Apr 2021 Chye Seng Fong (executor and trustee of the estate of Chye You, deceased) (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2021	Chye Seng Fong (executor and trustee of the estate of Chye You, deceased) (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment for the Defendant; the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of SGD 129,500 to the defendant.
4	Law Society v Leong Pek Gan: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Unlicensed Moneylending 06 Nov 2016 LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent)Lost	06 Nov 2016	LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent): Suspended from practiceThe respondent was suspended from practice for two-and-a-half years. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Society v Leong Pek Gan: Solicitor Disciplinary Proceedings for Aiding Unlicensed Moneylending 18 Aug 2016 LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent)Lost	18 Aug 2016	LEONG PEK GAN (Respondent): UnsuccessfulThe court found that due cause for disciplinary action against the Respondent has been shown inasmuch as all the charges preferred against her have been proved beyond reasonable doubt.
6	Anwar v Ng Chong & Hue: Breach of Retainer, Negligence & Reasonable Settlement 29 Sep 2015 NG SOON KAI (Respondent)Lost	29 Sep 2015	NG SOON KAI (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal found that the settlement entered into between the Appellants and SGBT was reasonable, and that it may be regarded as reflecting the proper measure of loss suffered by the Appellants. The Respondents are to pay US$1m to the Appellants.
7	Choo Liang Haw v Chua Seet Mui: Collective Sale Dispute over Gilstead Court Penalty Clauses 12 Feb 2015 WARREN KHOO (Plaintiff)Won	12 Feb 2015	WARREN KHOO (Plaintiff): Order for collective sale grantedOrder for collective sale granted, subject to striking out penalty clauses and modifying interest rate.
8	Soh Guan Cheow Anthony v Public Prosecutor: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Referral of Questions of Law 18 Nov 2014 Soh Guan Cheow Anthony (Applicant)Lost	18 Nov 2014	Soh Guan Cheow Anthony (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application for the trial judge to refer questions of law to the High Court was dismissed.
9	Anwar v Ng Chong & Hue: Negligence Claim over Mortgage & Personal Guarantees 02 Oct 2013 NG SOON KAI (Defendant)Won	02 Oct 2013	NG SOON KAI (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiffs' action was dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed.
10	Public Prosecutor v Tan Cheng Yew: Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating by Attorney 29 Nov 2012 Tan Cheng Yew (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2012	Tan Cheng Yew (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedTan Cheng Yew's appeal against his conviction on each of the four charges was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Chan Pui Woo Teresa v Ng Fook Khau Michael: Advance Fee Fraud & Negligent Misrepresentation 24 Mar 2011 Jonathan Tan See Leh (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2011	Jonathan Tan See Leh (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was granted in favor of the second defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
12	Hsu Ann Mei Amy v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Bank's Duty to Customer, Mental Capacity, Undue Influence 20 Jan 2011 Hsu Ann Mei Amy (personal representative of the estate of Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu, deceased) (Appellant)Partial	20 Jan 2011	Hsu Ann Mei Amy (personal representative of the estate of Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu, deceased) (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe substantive appeal was dismissed, but the appeal on costs was allowed.
13	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp v Asia Pacific Links: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Takeover Code 11 Oct 2010 Soh Guan Cheow Anthony (Defendant)Lost	11 Oct 2010	Soh Guan Cheow Anthony (Defendant): Claim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Law Society v Choy Chee Yean: Misconduct of Advocate and Solicitor 24 May 2010 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	24 May 2010	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Law Society's application for an order that the Respondent be made to suffer such punishment as provided for in section 83(1) of the Act was allowed.
15	Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Bank's Duty of Care & Customer's Mental Capacity 24 May 2010 Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu (by her litigation representative Hsu Ann Mei Amy) (Plaintiff)Lost	24 May 2010	Hwang Cheng Tsu Hsu (by her litigation representative Hsu Ann Mei Amy) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract and negligence was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Ong Siew Lay v Ong Boon Chuan: Trust over Shares in Tong Guan Food Products 22 Apr 2009 Ong Boon Chuan (Defendant)Lost	22 Apr 2009	Ong Boon Chuan (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; Boon Chuan was to pay her $2 million forthwith with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the writ to judgment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Ong Boon Kheng v PP: Securities & Futures Act - Misleading Statements & Criminal Procedure 06 Nov 2008 Ong Boon Kheng (Applicant)Lost	06 Nov 2008	Ong Boon Kheng (Applicant): Criminal Motion DismissedThe applicant's criminal motion seeking to reserve questions of law for the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
18	Lee Kim Kiat v Lee Biow Neo: Dispute over Purvis Properties' Sale Proceeds and Trust Claims 27 Dec 2007 Krishnamoorthy Sittampalam (Defendant)Won	27 Dec 2007	Krishnamoorthy Sittampalam (Defendant): Claims DismissedJL's claims against KMS were dismissed with costs.
19	Fan Juan Fen v Crocodile Holdings: Share Transfer, Dividends & Fraud Allegations 25 Aug 2005 Dato Dr Tan Hian Tsin (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2005	Dato Dr Tan Hian Tsin (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant. No specific monetary amount was mentioned in this judgment extract. Assumed currency is Singapore Dollar (SGD) as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
20	Oei Hong Leong v Ban Song Long David: Defamation, Fair Comment & Corporate Takeover 18 Jul 2005 Oei Hong Leong (Appellant)Lost	18 Jul 2005	Oei Hong Leong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	OCBC v Tan Teck Khong: Mortgage Enforceability & Undue Influence in Property Transaction 29 Mar 2005 Ng Yap and Partners (sued as a firm) (Defendant)Partial	29 Mar 2005	Ng Yap and Partners (sued as a firm) (Defendant): Nominal Damages AwardedNominal damages of $200 awarded against the third defendant for negligence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Chai Choon Yong v Central Provident Fund Board: Validity of CPF Nomination & Interpretation of 'Written Law' 27 Mar 2005 Central Provident Fund Board (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2005	Central Provident Fund Board (Respondent): Judgment in favor of respondentThe court found in favor of the Central Provident Fund Board, upholding the validity of the nomination.
23	Chan Emily v Kang Hock Chai Joachim: Breach of Trust Claim over Shares and Funds 17 Feb 2005 Chan Emily (Plaintiff)Won	17 Feb 2005	Chan Emily (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiff's claim allowed in full (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Oei Hong Leong v Ban Song Long David: Defamation Claim over NatSteel Shareholder Dispute 09 Nov 2004 Oei Hong Leong (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Nov 2004	Oei Hong Leong (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claim for defamation was dismissed.
25	V Retnasooria v Public Prosecutor: Immigration Act Offences & False Employment Pass Statements 25 Nov 2003 V Retnasooria (Appellant)Lost	25 Nov 2003	V Retnasooria (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the decision of the district judge to convict him of two offences under s 57(1)(k) of the Immigration Act was dismissed.
26	Clarke v SilkAir: Limitation of Liability for Passenger Deaths under Warsaw Convention 14 May 2002 Clarke Beryl Claire (as personal representative of the estate of Eugene Francis Clarke) (Appellant)Lost	14 May 2002	Clarke Beryl Claire (as personal representative of the estate of Eugene Francis Clarke) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with indemnity costs. The appellants failed to obtain a judgment more favorable than the terms of the offer to settle.
27	Khoo James v Gunapathy: Medical Negligence, Bolam Test & Brain Tumour Radiosurgery 12 May 2002 Neurological Surgery Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 May 2002	Neurological Surgery Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the High Court's decision was allowed.
28	Clarke v SilkAir: Warsaw Convention, Air Crash Liability & Pilot Misconduct 23 Oct 2001 Clarke Beryl Claire (as personal representative of the estate of Eugene Francis Clarke) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	23 Oct 2001	Clarke Beryl Claire (as personal representative of the estate of Eugene Francis Clarke) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim against SilkAir was dismissed with costs.
29	Clarke v Silkair: Limitation of Liability for Air Crash Deaths under Warsaw Convention 23 Oct 2001 Beryl Claire Clarke (as personal representative of the Estate of the Late Eugene Francis Clarke) (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Oct 2001	Beryl Claire Clarke (as personal representative of the Estate of the Late Eugene Francis Clarke) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim against SilkAir was dismissed with costs.
30	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure 11 Oct 2001 Ho Kon Kim (Appellant)Partial	11 Oct 2001	Ho Kon Kim (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with specific consequential orders regarding the sale of property and apportionment of outgoings.
31	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Breach of Trust & Mortgage Dispute 25 Sep 2001 Ho Kon Kim (Appellant)Partial	25 Sep 2001	Ho Kon Kim (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed against Ms Lim and RHB. Mdm Ho was awarded costs against Ms Lim and RHB. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit: Limitation Act & Failure of Consideration 08 May 2001 Ching Mun Fong (Appellant)Lost	08 May 2001	Ching Mun Fong (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed.
33	Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit: Limitation Act & Remedial Constructive Trusts 28 Sep 2000 Ching Mun Fong (executrix of the estate of Tan Geok Tee, deceased) (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Sep 2000	Ching Mun Fong (executrix of the estate of Tan Geok Tee, deceased) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to be paid to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Law Society of Singapore v Disciplinary Committee: Kwa Kim Li & Quahe Mei Lin - Professional Conduct & Touting 13 Aug 2000 Vivien Quahe Mei Lin (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2000	Vivien Quahe Mei Lin (Respondent): No cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action existsThe Disciplinary Committee determined that no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action existed under s 83 of the Legal Profession Act in respect of Vivien Quahe Mei Lin, and the High Court agreed.
35	Chng Gim Huat v PP: Tax Evasion Appeal - Interest Income Omission & Sentencing 04 Jul 2000 Chng Gim Huat (Appellant)Partial	04 Jul 2000	Chng Gim Huat (Appellant): Appeal against convictions dismissed; appeals against sentences allowed.Appeals against convictions dismissed; appeals against sentences allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
36	Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement 06 Mar 2000 Jay Henry Leung (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Mar 2000	Jay Henry Leung (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed with costs.
37	Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit: Res Judicata, Constructive Trusts & Amending Pleadings 11 Jan 2000 Ching Mun Fong (Appellant)Won	11 Jan 2000	Ching Mun Fong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appellant's appeal against the decision to strike out the statement of claim and disallow amendments was allowed.