Josh Samuel Tan Wensu

Josh Samuel Tan Wensu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and conspiracy by unlawful means. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and building and construction contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Payment Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Standard form contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore Institute of Architects standard form contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
REDAS Design and Build Conditions of Main Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Josh Samuel Tan Wensu has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Maroju v Epoch Minerals: Conspiracy & Failure of Consideration(Oct 2022) GTMS Construction v Ser Kim Koi: Costs Allocation in Construction Dispute(Feb 2021) CEQ v CER: Stay of Enforcement of Adjudication Determination Pending Appeal and Arbitration(Sep 2020)
cLegal LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Josh Samuel Tan Wensu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.8 parties avg	3.8	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Josh Samuel Tan Wensu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	500,000.00	125,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Maroju v Epoch Minerals: Conspiracy & Failure of Consideration 11 Oct 2022 Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Appellant)Lost	11 Oct 2022	Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $40,000 to Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	GTMS Construction v Ser Kim Koi: Costs Allocation in Construction Dispute 09 Feb 2021 Ser Kim Koi (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	09 Feb 2021	Ser Kim Koi (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Costs to be paidOrdered to pay costs to the plaintiff and third parties on a standard basis until specific dates, then on an indemnity basis thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	CEQ v CER: Stay of Enforcement of Adjudication Determination Pending Appeal and Arbitration 13 Sep 2020 CER (Respondent)Partial	13 Sep 2020	CER (Respondent): Partial Release of FundsPartial release of S$500,000 of the sums held in court solely for the purpose of legal fees in pursuing the arbitration and the appeal. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CEQ v CER: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 05 Apr 2020 CER (Respondent)Won	05 Apr 2020	CER (Respondent): Adjudication determination upheldThe court upheld the adjudication determination in favor of the respondent.
5	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management 11 Jul 2019 Fields Pacific Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jul 2019	Fields Pacific Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.