Jotham Tay

Jotham Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jotham Tay has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	8 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	8 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	7 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bail Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jotham Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jotham Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	100% of cases	PP v Yeo Liang Hou: Trafficking in Methamphetamine & Admissibility of Statements(May 2023) PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2023) Public Prosecutor v Jeganathan Balan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jotham Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	82.8 parties avg	2.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jotham Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	8(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Yeo Liang Hou: Trafficking in Methamphetamine & Admissibility of Statements 28 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdictThe Public Prosecutor secured a guilty verdict against both accused.
2	PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe court found both accused guilty of the charges.
3	Public Prosecutor v Jeganathan Balan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Feb 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Feb 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction and SentenceAccused convicted and sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane.
4	Chandroo Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.
5	Abdul Karim v Public Prosecutor: Dual Charging Practice under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
6	PP v Chandroo Subramaniam: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Sep 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Sep 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAll three accused persons were convicted of their respective charges.
7	PP v Sritharan K Raja Rajan: Misuse of Drugs Act - Importation of Diamorphine 10 Jun 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Jun 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted.
8	Public Prosecutor v Satesh s/o Navarlan: Appeal Against Short Detention Order for Domestic Violence 07 May 2019 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	07 May 2019	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the community-based sentences was allowed.