Joyce Fernando

Joyce Fernando is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and child custody. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joyce Fernando has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Divorce	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administration of Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Visitation Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joyce Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joyce Fernando has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance after Divorce(Nov 2012) AYL v AYM: Appeal Against Variation Orders on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance(Mar 2012) Lee Wei Kong v Ng Siok Tong: Motor Accident, Damages Assessment for Brain Injury(Jan 2012)
Robert Wang and Woo LLC	2 cases	29% of cases	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions(Jul 2005) CX v CY: Child Custody, Care & Control, and Access Dispute(Jan 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joyce Fernando's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Partial	42.0 parties avg	2.0	57%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joyce Fernando's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	4(57%)	57%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance after Divorce 22 Nov 2012 AYM (Appellant)Partial	22 Nov 2012	AYM (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal against the refusal to vary the terms of division of matrimonial assets was dismissed. Appeal against the order of a lump sum maintenance of $750,000 to be paid to the Wife out of the Husband’s share of the sale proceeds was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	AYL v AYM: Appeal Against Variation Orders on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 22 Mar 2012 AYL (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	22 Mar 2012	AYL (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against variation orders dismissed; AYL ordered to pay costs to AYM.
3	Lee Wei Kong v Ng Siok Tong: Motor Accident, Damages Assessment for Brain Injury 12 Jan 2012 Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) (Appellant)Partial	12 Jan 2012	Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with adjustments to damages for loss of future earnings, future psychiatric treatment, and mother's pre-trial loss of income. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lee Wei Kong v Ng Siok Tong: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries 28 Dec 2010 Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	28 Dec 2010	Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partPlaintiff's appeals against the dismissals of claims for future speech physiotherapy and occupational therapy costs, future nursing care, and future loss of earnings of the mother were dismissed. The award for pain and suffering and loss of amenities was reduced to $160,000, the award for the loss of earning capacity was reduced to $250,000, the award for costs of future psychiatric treatment was reduced to $90,000, and the award for the mother’s loss of income was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Kor Beng Shien v Lee Poh Lee: Estate Claim Over Transcrane Services & Resulting Trust Dispute 24 Nov 2009 Lee Poh Lee (Defendant)Lost	24 Nov 2009	Lee Poh Lee (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedLee’s counterclaim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions 18 Jul 2005 CY (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2005	CY (Respondent): Orders UpheldJoint custody and overseas access orders upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	CX v CY: Child Custody, Care & Control, and Access Dispute 27 Jan 2005 CX (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	27 Jan 2005	CX (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal partially allowedJoint custody granted to both parents, care and control to the mother, and access arrangements specified for the father. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.