Joycelyn Lin

Joycelyn Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shortfall in funds held on trust for creditors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appropriate method of distributing funds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Receipts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pledges and Pawns	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joycelyn Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joycelyn Lin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PRP Law LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers(Sep 2021) Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ: Distribution of Assets in Winding Up(Mar 2018)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ Bank: Commingled Goods, Security Interests & Trust Receipts(Mar 2017) iTronic Holdings Pte Ltd and PPS Capital Pte Ltd v Tan Swee Leon: Debt Recovery, Liquidated Damages, and Sham Agreements(Apr 2016)
KhattarWong	1 cases	20% of cases	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute(May 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joycelyn Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.4
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Neutral	118.0 parties avg	18.0	20%
Won	37.0 parties avg	7.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2018	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joycelyn Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers 07 Sep 2021 HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Sep 2021	HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ: Distribution of Assets in Winding Up 15 Mar 2018 Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	15 Mar 2018	Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication under s 310(1)(a) of the Companies Act granted; the court determined that the rolling charge method should be used in respect of sales proceeds for all of the Disputed Categories. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ Bank: Commingled Goods, Security Interests & Trust Receipts 01 Mar 2017 Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff)Neutral	01 Mar 2017	Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application for determination of distribution of sale proceedsThe liquidators sought a determination from the court regarding the distribution of sale proceeds from commingled pepper stock. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	iTronic Holdings Pte Ltd and PPS Capital Pte Ltd v Tan Swee Leon: Debt Recovery, Liquidated Damages, and Sham Agreements 20 Apr 2016 Tan Swee Leon (Defendant)Lost	20 Apr 2016	Tan Swee Leon (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's defense dismissed; required to pay the full claim amount (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute 25 May 2009 India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	25 May 2009	India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedChesney LLP’s claim against India Insurance for payment of the sum was dismissed.