Jude Benny

Jude Benny is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and negligence. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jude Benny has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
General Average	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
York Antwerp Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Exclusion Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jude Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jude Benny has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	3 cases	75% of cases	Jan De Nul NV v Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd ("Inai Selasih") : Admiralty Jurisdiction, Sham Charterparty & Vessel Arrest(Feb 2006) Sunlight Mercantile v Ever Lucky Shipping: General Average & Seaworthiness(Nov 2003) Teng He v Nordic Explorer: Collision at Sea, Negligence, and Contributory Negligence in Bo Hai Gulf(Mar 2000)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Centaurea International Pte Ltd v Citus Trading Pte Ltd: Validation of Payments under Companies Act s 259(Nov 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jude Benny's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jude Benny's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Centaurea International Pte Ltd v Citus Trading Pte Ltd: Validation of Payments under Companies Act s 259 30 Nov 2016 Citus Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Nov 2016	Citus Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Payments ValidatedThe payments made to the defendant were validated (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Jan De Nul NV v Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd ("Inai Selasih") : Admiralty Jurisdiction, Sham Charterparty & Vessel Arrest 01 Feb 2006 Jan De Nul NV (Appellant)Partial	01 Feb 2006	Jan De Nul NV (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed only to the extent that the order as to damages made in favor of the respondent in relation to the arrest of the Inai Selasih was set aside. The decision to set aside the Writ and the Warrant of Arrest was affirmed.
3	Sunlight Mercantile v Ever Lucky Shipping: General Average & Seaworthiness 20 Nov 2003 Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd (Respondent)Lost	20 Nov 2003	Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs.
4	Teng He v Nordic Explorer: Collision at Sea, Negligence, and Contributory Negligence in Bo Hai Gulf 30 Mar 2000 Nordic Explorer (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Mar 2000	Nordic Explorer (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff, with the defendants found 60% liable. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.