Jude P. Benny

Jude P. Benny is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jude P. Benny has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
General Average	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
York Antwerp Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jude P. Benny has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jude P. Benny has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	3 cases	50% of cases	Hailisen Shipping v Pan-United Shipyard: Interpretation of Supreme Court of Judicature Act s 34(2)(a)(Nov 2003) Ever Lucky Shipping v Sunlight Mercantile: General Average Contribution & Seaworthiness Under Hague Rules(Apr 2003) Tribune Investment v Soosan Trading: Tortious Interference & Contract Dispute over Floating Dock PD 177 Sale(Jul 2000)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders(Oct 2020) Fico Sports v Thong Hup Gardens: Tenancy Dispute over Land Use and Sub-letting Rights(Aug 2010)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	1 cases	17% of cases	Teng He: Apportionment of Responsibility in Negligence Case Involving Damage to Submerged Seismic Cables(Sep 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jude P. Benny's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jude P. Benny's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders 08 Oct 2020 Costank (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	08 Oct 2020	Costank (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs and disbursements in the total sum of $30,000 to be paid by the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Fico Sports v Thong Hup Gardens: Tenancy Dispute over Land Use and Sub-letting Rights 16 Aug 2010 Fico Sports Inc Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Aug 2010	Fico Sports Inc Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedFico Sports' claim for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and specific performance was dismissed.
3	Hailisen Shipping v Pan-United Shipyard: Interpretation of Supreme Court of Judicature Act s 34(2)(a) 05 Nov 2003 Hailisen Shipping Co Ltd (Applicant)Lost	05 Nov 2003	Hailisen Shipping Co Ltd (Applicant): Motion DismissedHailisen Shipping Co Ltd's motion to strike out the appeal was dismissed.
4	Ever Lucky Shipping v Sunlight Mercantile: General Average Contribution & Seaworthiness Under Hague Rules 14 Apr 2003 Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Apr 2003	Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentEntitled to recover general average contribution only from deck cargo. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Teng He: Apportionment of Responsibility in Negligence Case Involving Damage to Submerged Seismic Cables 24 Sep 2000 Owners of the cables (Respondent)Lost	24 Sep 2000	Owners of the cables (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were held liable for 60% of the damage, while the appellants were liable for 40%.
6	Tribune Investment v Soosan Trading: Tortious Interference & Contract Dispute over Floating Dock PD 177 Sale 06 Jul 2000 Tribune Investment Trust Inc (Appellant)Lost	06 Jul 2000	Tribune Investment Trust Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's claims for tortious interference, conspiracy, and breach of contract were all dismissed.